MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2791633035 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.116

A116 LOSS OF RESPONSE TO VEDOLIZUMAB MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN CROHN`S DISEASE

2018· article· en· W2791633035 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher Ma, Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Abdulelah Almutairdi, Ahmed Al‐Darmaki, Shane Devlin, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Cynthia H. Seow, Kerri L. Novak, Cathy Lu, Jose G. Ferraz, Michael J. Stewart, Michelle Buresi, M. Mathivanan, Joan Heatherington, M Martin, Remo Panaccione

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineMaintenance therapyDiscontinuationInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseRegimenRetrospective cohort studyGastroenterologySurgeryDiseaseChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vedolizumab is a gut-specific alpha-4-beta-7 integrin antagonist that has demonstrated efficacy in induction and maintenance of clinical response and remission in Crohn’s disease randomized controlled trials. To evaluate the long-term maintenance of response achieved with vedolizumab therapy in Crohn’s disease in the real-world setting. A retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of Calgary of adult (≥18 years) CD patients responding to vedolizumab within 6 months of standard induction therapy (vedolizumab 300mg IV at weeks 0, 2, and 6) followed by a scheduled maintenance vedolizumab IV regimen. The primary outcome was composite loss of response (LOR) in follow-up, defined by worsening symptoms requiring vedolizumab dose escalation, rescue medical therapy with corticosteroids or immunomodulators, or vedolizumab discontinuation. Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier plots was performed to assess median time to LOR and probability of LOR in follow-up. 109 CD patients with symptomatic response within 6 months to vedolizumab induction therapy were followed for a mean duration of 46.3 weeks (SD ±31.3 weeks). Mean Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) at induction was 6.3 (± 3.2); 68.8% (75/109) of patients had previously failed biologic therapy and 45 patients (41.3%) had previously failed multiple biologic agents. Composite loss of response occurred in 36 patients (33.0%) in follow-up at a mean time of 35.2 weeks (± 20.9 weeks). Dose escalation of vedolizumab to 300mg IV every four weeks was required in 22 patients (20.1%) to optimize primary clinical response in the context of ongoing symptoms despite every eight week therapy. Dose escalation for secondary loss of response occurred in 10 patients (9.2%) at a mean time of 38.9 weeks (± 5.0 weeks). Addition of rescue corticosteroids or immunomodulators was attempted in six patients (5.5%). Vedolizumab was discontinued due to loss of response in 22 patients (20.2%); mean time to drug discontinuation was 42.3 weeks (± 23.3 weeks). At 52 weeks, the probability of developing a composite loss of response was 36.7% [95% CI: 26.6 – 49.2%]. The probability of continuing on vedolizumab therapy at 52 weeks among initial symptomatic responders was 75.6% [95% CI: 62.8 – 84.5%]. Over three quarters of patients who respond symptomatically to vedolizumab induction therapy continue on treatment at one year, but 1/3 of patients will experience a loss of response and approximately 20% will discontinue treatment due to loss of response during maintenance therapy. Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier survival curve for probability of composite loss of response among 109 Crohn’s disease patients with primary clinical response/remission within 6 months of induction. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→