MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791691441 · doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000001037

Evaluating the Utility of the Lateral Elbow Radiograph in Central Articular Olecranon Reduction: An Anatomic and Radiographic Study

2018· article· en· W2791691441 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy F. Kubik, Prism Schneider, Richard Buckley, Robert Korley, Paul Duffy, Ryan Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlecranonMedicineElbowRadiographyCadaveric spasmOrthopedic surgeryReduction (mathematics)CadaverFixation (population genetics)Soft tissueSurgeryRadiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The surgical reduction of intra-articular olecranon fractures is judged primarily on the lateral elbow radiograph, as orthogonal imaging of the articular surface is not obtainable. We sought to determine surgeon accuracy in identifying intra-articular olecranon malreductions on the lateral elbow radiograph. METHODS: Six human fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were sagittally sectioned in 5-mm increments after olecranon dissection, preservation of soft tissue envelope, and rigid fixation of the elbow in an external fixator. Three patterns of central intra-articular olecranon malreduction were created in each elbow using a ruler and bone saw. Perfect lateral elbow radiographs were taken of each malreduction, and these images were randomized along with x-rays of normal cadaveric olecranons. The image series was presented to 4 masked trauma-trained surgeons to determine whether the olecranon was malreduced or anatomic. Surgeons interpreted the same image series on 2 separate occasions separated by 6 weeks. Percent correct was recorded, and the interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated. RESULTS: Orthopedic trauma surgeons correctly identified olecranon malreductions only 73% of the time on the lateral elbow radiograph. Interobserver agreement was moderate for the first review of images and fair for the second review, with respective Fleiss Kappa values of 0.43 and 0.28. Intrarater reliability revealed moderate agreement with Cohen's Kappa value ranging from 0.56 to 0.66. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular olecranon malreductions are inconsistently recognized by trauma surgeons on the lateral elbow radiograph. Therefore, articular incongruity may still be present after surgical fixation of comminuted olecranon fractures. We must further define the radiographic anatomic representation of the articular olecranon to improve surgical reduction and clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic TraumaSame topicElbow and Forearm Trauma TreatmentFrench-language works237,207