Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy 12 Weeks after Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Tubal Ligation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Since 1895, at least 67 ectopic pregnancies have been reported in patients previously subjected to hysterectomy. Most of them were abdominal or vaginal total hysterectomies. Only four cases of ectopic pregnancies in patients who had undergone hysterectomies have been reported after a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH), with three of them having occurred years after surgery. Case Report: A 40-year-old white Caucasian woman was admitted to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain for 20 min, 12 weeks after LSH and tubal ligation. Rapid examination using ultrasounds scan did not show free liquid in the abdomen, and initially, the cause of pain was not identified. However, the patient became unstable and 4 h after symptom presentation, a second ultrasound scan revealed a significant amount of free liquid in the abdomen. Quantification of β-HCG confirmed the suspicion of a ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy.Conclusions: Ectopic pregnancy is one of the conditions to be considered in differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in women of child-bearing age. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an ectopic pregnancy occurring as early as 3 months after LSH and tubal ligation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".