1199: Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG) Phase II Study Using Docetaxel/Prednisone in the Second Line Setting for Metastatic Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer in Patients Progressing after First Line Mitoxantrone/Prednisone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UROLOGy® potentiai confounders.An unexpected finding was that the effect of baseline HGB on overall and progression-free survival varied significantly by race.Below a baseline HGB of 11.7 g/dL black patients had worse overall survival than their non-black counterparts (significant only below 7.8 g/dL).Above 11.7 g/dL, black patients had better overall survival than their non-black counterparts (significant only above 14.2 g/dL).CONCLUSIONS: In this newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer sample, HGB change after 3 months of ADT was heterogenous and was associated with shorter survival and shorter progression-free survival after adjustment for disease status and other baseline covariates.While race alone was not a strong predictor of death or disease progression, the effect of baseline hemoglobin on overall and progression-free survival varied significantly by race.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".