SUBJECTIVE NORMS, SELF-EFFICACY AND GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO INTENTION TO USE INTERNET BANKING (IN ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subjects of this study were santri who use internet banking in Yogyakarta. The study use questionnaire survey method. Its exogenous variables were Subjective Norms, Self-Efficacy and Government Support, while its endogen variable is Intention Internet Banking. Data were analysis using multi variant structural Equation Modeling. Software used in processing data was AMOS and SPSS. The test results used were validity test, and reliability test. The objective of this study is to understand the influence of Subjective norms, Self-Efficacy and Government Support to Intention Internet Banking Santri in Yogyakarta in Islamic perspective. The study was conducted by distributing 400 questionnaires to santri who use internet banking started from December 2015 to April 2016. Qualified questionnaires were 341 (85, 24%). Based on sex male (santri) were 68, 12 % and female (Santriwati) were 31, 87 %. Base on the research can be concluded that subjective norms are influence to intention internet banking (1,257) but statistic result show not significant. And self-Efficacy is positive significant influence to intention internet banking (1,477). And Government Support is positive significant influence to intention internet banking (0,107).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".