MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791815607 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.200

A techno-economic model for application of geothermal heat pump systems

2017· article· en· W2791815607 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Ali Ghoreishi‐Madiseh, Ali Fahrettin Kuyuk

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeothermal gradientHeat pumpGeothermal energyGeothermal heatingElectricityRenewable heatEnvironmental scienceEngineeringElectricity generationProcess engineeringHybrid heatMechanical engineeringPower (physics)Heat exchangerElectrical engineeringGeologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For more than five decades, geothermal heat pumps have been used to provide low grade geothermal energy for heating/cooling purposes. Though the geothermal energy of the earth is free, the heat pump in charge of upgrading the lower grade heat runs on relatively expensive electric power. Therefore, in short-and-long-term, the economic feasibility of each geothermal heating project is directly dependent on the balance between energy savings and energy costs; heat versus electricity. While energy savings are usually evaluated based on the heat flux provided on the resource side, the electricity consumption is significantly affected by the overall Coefficient of Performance of the heat pump. Also, an important factor affecting the operating costs and therefore the economic feasibility of a geothermal heat pump will be the price gap between heat and electricity. On another aspect, the economic feasibility of a geothermal heat pump system can drastically vary based on its site-specific requirements. In the absence of proper guidelines for analyzing the feasibility of geothermal heat pump systems, application of such systems may lead to huge financial risks. Therefore, there is a fundamental need for development of a comprehensive but simple engineering tool with which the feasibility of application of geothermal heat pump systems can be evaluated. The present study identifies non-dimensional parameters based on which the feasibility of a geothermal project can be effectively assessed. The selected set of parameters is then used to develop an economic model to quantify the economic indicators such as energy costs, savings, revenues and internal rates of return. Field data from a real-life engineering project is incorporated into the model to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of this case. Based on the results of this study, geothermal heat pump applications are categorized into infeasible, weakly-feasible, fairly-feasible and strongly-feasible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207