MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791869327 · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.03.005

Myocardial Infarction Injury in Patients with Chronic Lung Disease Entering Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Frequency and Association with Heart Rate Parameters

2018· article· en· W2791869327 on OpenAlexafffund
Carmen A. Sima, Benny Lau, Carolyn Taylor, Stephan F. van Eeden, W. Darlene Reid, A. William Sheel, Ashley Kirkham, Pat G. Camp

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthMichael Smith Health Research BCUniversity of TorontoProvidence Health CareSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BCBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsMedicineChronotropicInternal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionPulmonary rehabilitationHeart ratePopulationOdds ratioRehabilitationElectrocardiographyPhysical therapyCOPDBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction (MI) remains under‐recognized in chronic lung disease (CLD) patients. Rehabilitation health professionals need accessible clinical measurements to identify the presence of prior MI in order to determine appropriate training prescription. Objectives To estimate prior MI in CLD patients entering a pulmonary rehabilitation program, as well as its association with heart rate parameters such as resting heart rate and chronotropic response index. Design Retrospective cohort design. Setting Pulmonary rehabilitation outpatient clinic in a tertiary care university‐affiliated hospital. Patients Eighty‐five CLD patients were studied. Methods Electrocardiograms at rest and peak cardiopulmonary exercise testing, performed before pulmonary rehabilitation, were analyzed. Electrocardiographic evidence of prior MI, quantified by the Cardiac Infarction Injury Score (CIIS), was contrasted with reported myocardial events and then correlated with resting heart rate and chronotropic response index parameters. Main outcome measurements CIIS, resting heart rate, and chronotropic response index. Results Sixteen CLD patients (19%) demonstrated electrocardiographic evidence of prior MI, but less than half (8%) had a reported MI history ( P < .05). The Cohen's kappa test revealed poor level of agreement between CIIS and medical records (kappa = 0.165), indicating that prior MI diagnosis was under‐reported in the medical records. Simple and multiple regression analyses showed that resting heart rate but not chronotropic response index was positively associated with CIIS in our population ( R 2 = 0.29, P < .001). CLD patients with a resting heart rate higher than 80 beats/min had approximately 5 times higher odds of having prior MI, as evidenced by a CIIS ≥ 20. Conclusions CLD patients entering pulmonary rehabilitation are at risk of unreported prior MI. Elevated resting heart rate appears to be an indicator of prior MI in CLD patients; therefore, careful adjustment of training intensity is recommended under these circumstances. Level of Evidence III

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207