Pollutants Removal Performance of Modified Constructed Rapid Infiltration System at Low Temperature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conventional Constructed Rapid Infiltration (CRI) system has a low removal rate for total nitrogen, although it has good removal effects on organic pollutants, ammonia nitrogen, suspended solid, etc. To improve the nitrogen removal performance of CRI system, two modified simulated columns were constructed in laboratory. The results in the domestic sewage treatment tests for these two modified systems was compared with conventional system. The system with the addition of an anaerobic saturated water layer only can increase the total nitrogen removal from 22.14% to 32.13% compared with the conventional system, however it contributes little to Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) removal. Whereas in the system which is added with an anaerobic saturated water layer and extra carbon source entrance at the bottom, the average concentration of COD is decreased to 7.78 mg/l in the effluent wastewater, which is about 21 mg/l less than that of conventional column. The average removal rate of total nitrogen is increased to over 62%, which is almost three times that of the conventional system and two times that of the system with the addition of anaerobic saturated water layer only. Moreover, its average concentration of nitrate nitrogen is significantly decreased in the effluent wastewater. The improved pollutant removal of the system added with anaerobic saturated water layer and extra carbon source entrance resulted from the anaerobic environment, carbon sources and time for nitrate retention which are essential to denitrification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".