MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791926422 · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/aaaa30

Computational study of the electronic spectra of the rare gas fluorohydrides HRgF (Rg = Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn)

2018· article· en· W2791926422 on OpenAlexafffund
Miriam D van Hoeve, Mariusz Kłobukowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of AlbertaUniversities Space Research Association
KeywordsRare gasAtomic physicsSpectral lineKryptonPhysicsXenonMaterials scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation of the electronic spectra of HRgF (Rg = Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn) was carried out using the time-dependent density functional method, with the CAMB3LYP functional and several basis sets augmented with even-tempered diffuse functions. A full spectral assignment for the HRgF systems was done. The effect of the rare gas matrix on the HRgF (Rg = Ar and Kr) spectra was investigated and it was found that the matrix blue-shifted the spectra. Scalar relativistic effects on the spectra were also studied and it was found that while the excitation energies of HArF and HKrF were insignificantly affected by relativistic effects, most of the excitation energies of HXeF and HRnF were red-shifted. Spin–orbit coupling was found to significantly affect excitation energies in HRnF. Analysis of performance of the model core potential basis set relative to all-electron (AE) basis sets showed that the former basis set increased computational efficiency and gave results similar to those obtained with the AE basis set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsSame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207