Computational study of the electronic spectra of the rare gas fluorohydrides HRgF (Rg = Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Simulation of the electronic spectra of HRgF (Rg = Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn) was carried out using the time-dependent density functional method, with the CAMB3LYP functional and several basis sets augmented with even-tempered diffuse functions. A full spectral assignment for the HRgF systems was done. The effect of the rare gas matrix on the HRgF (Rg = Ar and Kr) spectra was investigated and it was found that the matrix blue-shifted the spectra. Scalar relativistic effects on the spectra were also studied and it was found that while the excitation energies of HArF and HKrF were insignificantly affected by relativistic effects, most of the excitation energies of HXeF and HRnF were red-shifted. Spin–orbit coupling was found to significantly affect excitation energies in HRnF. Analysis of performance of the model core potential basis set relative to all-electron (AE) basis sets showed that the former basis set increased computational efficiency and gave results similar to those obtained with the AE basis set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".