Aspartic Acid Synthesis by Escherichia coli Strains with Deleted Fumarase Genes as Biocatalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The work reports the construction of Escherichia coli strain MG1655 derivatives with deleted genes that encode fumarases ( fumAC , fumB , and fumABC ) via the phage lambda-mediated recombination system. It has been demonstrated that the deletion of fumB gene had almost no effect on strain growth under aerobic conditions, while the deletion of the fumA and fumC genes led to a 30% decrease in the growth rate under the same conditions. When the E. coli strains with deleted fumarase genes were used to catalyze L-aspartic acid synthesis from ammonium fumarate (1.5 M solution), it was observed that only the simultaneous loss of both the fumA and fumC genes led to an at least 20% increase in the aspartic acid yields and a concurrent decrease in the content of the byproduct malic acid in the reaction mixture from 40 to 1.5–2 g/L. The results obtained in the work may be used to generate more efficient novel biocatalysts of L-aspartic acid synthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".