MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792059589 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.196

A195 GLUTAMINE SYNTHETASE IN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS OF THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER: NEW TARGET FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY?

2018· article· en· W2792059589 on OpenAlexaff
Mariana M. Oliveira, Mélanie Tremblay, Christopher F. Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperammonemiaGlutamine synthetaseHepatic encephalopathyWestern blotGlutamineBlood–brain barrierInternal medicineEndocrinologyGlutamate receptorBiologyChemistryMedicineBiochemistryCentral nervous systemAmino acidCirrhosisGeneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The liver plays a major role in regulating ammonia levels in the blood. Therefore, in liver disease the loss of hepatic function leads to hyperammonemia and increased brain ammonia and consequently hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Ammonia-lowering strategies remain the mainstay therapeutic strategy. Ammonia, both as an ion (NH4+) and gas (NH3), easily crosses all plasma membranes, including the blood brain barrier (BBB); the interface between the blood and the brain. Glutamine synthetase (GS), an enzyme which in the process of amidating glutamate to glutamine removes ammonia, plays an important compensatory role during liver disease. GS is expressed in muscle and brain (primarily in astrocytes) but has never been thoroughly explored in the BBB. Therefore, the aim is to evaluate GS expression in endothelial cells of the BBB. Using primary rat brain microvascular endothelial cells (ECs), the presence of GS was assessed using rtPCR, western blot, immunohistochemistry and activity assay. Furthermore, we isolated cerebral microvessels (CMV) from the frontal cortex of naïve rats and measured GS expression by western blot using brain lysates as positive control and by immunohistochemistry (co-localized with caveolin-1, a marker for ECs). In addition, to understand the effect of ammonia on GS, ECs were exposed to 1mM of ammonia chloride for 48h. Finally, ECs were subjected to plasma from bile-duct ligated (BDL) rats (model of chronic liver disease) or sham-operated controls. We have characterized this BDL model and found both systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, in addition to hyperammonemia. ECs expressed GS mRNA, protein and activity. However, expression of GS was lower compared to brain lysate control samples (p<0.05). GS expression in CMV showed similar results to brain but GS activity was less (p<0.05). Using immunohistochemistry, GS was detected in ECs and in vessels of brain from naïve rats. When cells were submitted to ammonia, an increase in GS activity was demonstrated (p<0.05). However, when exposed to conditioned medium from BDL rats, GS was decreased when compared to sham-operated controls (p<0.01). These results demonstrate for the first time that GS is present in ECs in both in vivo and in vitro. The lower expression of the enzyme compared to that found in the brain, could explain why GS has never been reported in these cells. Interestingly, ammonia stimulates GS in ECs, but its activity is decreased in the presence of other pathogenic factors in plasma from cirrhotic rats such as oxidative stress and inflammation. We speculate that a downregulation of GS allows for a faster and easier entry of ammonia into the brain and therefore may be implicated in the pathogenesis of HE. We anticipate increasing GS in ECs of the BBB could become a new therapeutic target for HE. CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders→French-language works237,207→