MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792090780 · doi:10.4172/2572-4916.1000189

Effect of a Monoshot Injection of a High-Density Hyaluronic Acid Gel in Patients with Primary Knee Osteoarthritis. Preliminary Results of the “No-Dolor” Study

2018· article· en· W2792090780 on OpenAlex
J. Balsalobre, Josep Combalia, C Emsellem, Y Gaslain, Danial Khorsandi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntramuscular injections and effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyaluronic acidOsteoarthritisMedicineKnee painPrimary (astronomy)Physical therapyPathologyAnatomyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Pronolis® HD Mono 2.5% (4.8 mL) is a sterile viscoelastic solution of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) that has been recently commercialized (medical device class III). It contains the highest concentration of HA (2.5%: 120 mg HA in 4.8 mL) and is currently available in Spain for intraarticular injection in the knee.The main objective of the study is to evaluate the evolution of pain in patients diagnosed with primary knee osteoarthritis treated with Pronolis® HD Mono 2.5% (4.8 mL). Methods: An observational, real-life, multicentric (60 specialized care centers), prospective, open study planned to include 300 patients diagnosed with primary knee osteoarthritis (according to ACR criteria, pain at inclusion equal or superior to 4 out of 10) in order to evaluate the pain evolution, measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).After a single dose of Pronolis® HD Mono 2.5% (4.8 mL), patients are followed for 6 months. Preliminary results are presented to observe the first trends of change, 3 months vs. basal:- In the pain domain score of the WOMAC-A questionnaire (main criteria). - In the score of the domain of joint stiffness, functional capacity and pain in movement (WOMAC-B and C and 1st question of WOMAC-A) (secondary criteria). - In the evolution of the quality of life measured by the international standardized health questionnaire EQ-5D-5L. The study is approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of the Hospital del Mar in Barcelona (CEIC-Parc de Salut Mar). Results: Currently, 3 months data of 14 patients is available out of the 24 patients included to date. The degree of pain assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC-A) shows an average improvement in pain of 7.71 points (54.5%). In 11 (78.6%) of the 14 patients, the average degree of pain improvement is equal to or greater than 30%. The degree of stiffness in the joint, the functional capacity of the patient and the degree of pain in movement show an average improvement of 3.71 points (62.87%), of 30.64 points (58.08%) and of 1, 71 points (55.95%), respectively. Quality of life improves in the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L improvement of quality of life has measured 34.52% in mobility, 41.67% in personal care, 39.88% in daily activities, 45.83% in pain/discomfort and 61.90% in anxiety/depression. No patient has presented adverse reactions to the investigational product. Conclusion: After 3 months of the intra-articular injection of a mono-shot, high-density HA gel (Pronolis® HD Mono- Shot 2.5%) patients with primary knee osteoarthritis show an important tendency to improve pain, joint stiffness, functional capacity and quality of life. These preliminary results need to be confirmed upon study completion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it