MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792142152 · doi:10.1097/mol.0000000000000492

The lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferases (acylglycerophosphate acyltransferases) family: one reaction, five enzymes, many roles

2018· review· en· W2792142152 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan M. Bradley, Robin E. Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Lipidology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcyltransferasesLysophosphatidic acidChemistryBiochemistryEnzymeBiosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferases (LPAATs)/acylglycerophosphate acyltransferases (AGPATs) are a homologous group of enzymes that all catalyze the de novo formation of phosphatidic acid from lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and a fatty acyl-CoA. This review seeks to resolve the apparent redundancy of LPAATs through examination of recent literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent molecular studies suggest that individual LPAAT homologues produce functionally distinct pools of phosphatidic acid, whereas gene ablation studies demonstrate unique roles despite a similar biochemical function. Loss of the individual enzymes not only causes diverse effects on down-stream lipid metabolism, which can vary even for a single enzyme from one tissue to the next, but also results in a wide array of physiological consequences, ranging from cognitive impairment, to lipodystrophy, to embryonic lethality. SUMMARY: LPAATs are critical mediators of cell membrane phospholipid synthesis, regulating the production of specific down-stream glycerophospholipid species through generation of distinct pools of phosphatidic acid that feed into dedicated biosynthetic pathways. Loss of any specific LPAAT can lead to alterations in cellular and organellar membrane phospholipid composition that can vary for a single enzyme in different tissues, with unique pathophysiological implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in LipidologySame topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207