MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792149857 · doi:10.1002/rth2.12086

Design and rationale for the DIVERSITY study: An open‐label, randomized study of dabigatran etexilate for pediatric venous thromboembolism

2018· article· en· W2792149857 on OpenAlexaff
Manuela Albisetti, Branislav Biss, Lisa Bomgaars, Leonardo R. Brandão, Martina Brueckmann, Elizabeth Chalmers, Savion Gropper, Ruth Harper, Fenglei Huang, Matteo Luciani, Ivan Manastirski, Lesley Mitchell, Igor Tartakovsky, Bushi Wang, Jacqueline ML Halton

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationUniversity of OttawaHospital for Sick Children
FundersBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsMedicineDosingDabigatranVenous thromboembolismHeparinRandomized controlled trialIntensive care medicineLow molecular weight heparinClinical trialSurgeryWarfarinInternal medicineThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlabelled Box •Current standard of care (SOC) for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) has limitations. •Dabigatran etexilate (DE) versus SOC will be studied in children with VTE in a phase IIb/III trial. •A dosing algorithm for DE in children will be assessed guiding dosing. •Valuable data on the safety and efficacy of DE for VTE in children will be obtained. All authors have had full access to data and contributed to drafting of paper. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG Boehringer Ingelheim Background The current standard of care (SOC) for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprises unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) followed by LMWH or vitamin K antagonists, all of which have limitations. Dabigatran etexilate (DE) has demonstrated efficacy and safety for adult VTE and has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of the current SOC. Pediatric trials are needed to establish dosing in children and to confirm that results obtained in adults are applicable in the pediatric setting. Objectives To describe the design and rationale of a planned phase IIb/III trial that will evaluate a proposed dosing algorithm for DE and assess the safety and efficacy of DE versus SOC for pediatric VTE treatment. Patients/Methods An open‐label, randomized, parallel‐group noninferiority study will be conducted in approximately 180 patients aged 0 to <18 years with VTE, who have received initial UFH or LMWH treatment and who are expected to require ≥3 months of anticoagulation therapy. Patients will receive DE or SOC for 3 months. DE will be administered twice daily as capsules, pellets, or an oral liquid formulation according to patient age. Initial doses will be calculated using a proposed dosing algorithm. Results There will be two coprimary endpoints: a composite efficacy endpoint comprising the proportion of patients with complete thrombus resolution, freedom from recurrent VTE and VTE‐related mortality, and a safety endpoint: freedom from major bleeding events. Conclusion Findings will provide valuable information regarding the efficacy and safety of DE for the treatment of pediatric VTE. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01895777.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.452
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.050 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and HaemostasisSame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207