MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792178716 · doi:10.1071/aseg2018abt7_4h

Geologically-Constrained Interpretation of Airborne Electromagnetic Data for Definition of Prospective Groundwater Resources, Albany Hinterland, Western Australia

2018· article· en· W2792178716 on OpenAlexaff
James Reid, Sheryl Ryan, Cahit Yesertener

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMira Geoscience (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedrockGeologyBasementProterozoicGeomorphologyInversion (geology)GroundwaterGeochemistryGeophysicsPaleontologyTectonicsStructural basinArchaeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic survey was flown in the Albany Hinterland with the objective of determining likely palaeochannel locations for future groundwater exploration. The basement in the survey area is the Proterozoic Nornalup Complex, which is overlain by Tertiary-Eocene sediments, including the Werillup Formation and Pallinup Siltstone. These units are overlain by Quaternary sediments of thickness 10 - 70 m. The maximum thickness of cover materials overlying basement is ~100 m. The main aquifers in the area are Werillup Formation sands within palaeochannels incised into the basement.The conductivity derived from the TEMPEST data shows a layer of moderate electrical conductivity (50 - 150+ mS/m), which correlates well with clayey units within the Werillup Formation, and possibly also the weathered upper part of the Proterozoic bedrock. Bedrock conductivities are typically low (average ~1.2 mS/m). The strong electrical contrast between the Werillup Formation and the bedrock allowed depth to Proterozoic basement to be interpreted from the TEMPEST data. This was done by conventional unconstrained layered-earth inversion followed by manual interpretation of the depth to bedrock on each survey line. The interpreted bedrock depths were used to construct a triangulated surface representing base of cover. Geologically-constrained inversion of the TEMPEST data was then undertaken to refine the preliminary depth to basement model. Geological constraints on the model were provided by drillhole basement pierce points and outcrop. A large number of drillholes which did not reach bedrock were also used. The inversion was constrained to place the final bedrock surface below the ends of these drillholes.The geologically-constrained inversion and subsequent synthesised interpretation identified a number of bedrock lows which have been confirmed by drilling to correspond to palaeochannels, and has defined four main groundwater resource areas. The results of the interpretation have formed the framework for the Albany Hinterland Prospective Groundwater map (Ryan et al., 2016).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207