Comparison of Bread-Making Quality on Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain YTPR1 Prepared in Different Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of study was to investigate bread-making quality on wild-type S. cerevisiae YTPR1 isolated from pear Red Bartlett fruits harvested in Yamagata, Japan, and was to compare its qualities on YTPR1 prepared in different conditions. Bread produced using frozen strain YTPR1 had a thin skin and crisp skin surface in crust, and had a moist and soft eat-feeling in crumb. Loaf was spread largely, but its bottom had relatively density. Loaf showed the same weight and volume, moisture, expansion ratio, specific volume, weight loss, and breaking force of crumb as that using commercially available dried yeast. In crust of loaf, L* value was higher but a* and b* values were lower than those of commercially available dried yeast. From results of brownness index, crust had a light brown color (golden brown color). In crumb, loaf was evaluated as appreciable in color difference. That is, loaf had an even baked color (desirable golden brown color). On the other hand, bread-making qualities on freeze-dried yeast, trehalose-addition yeast, glycerol-addition yeast, and L-glutamic acid-addition yeast were inferior to that on commercially available dried yeast. It concluded that high quality of bread with acceptable attributes could be produced using frozen yeast strain YTPR1 isolated from pear Red Bartlett fruits. However, these substances had not functions as cryoprotectant or cryosensitizer on yeast cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".