MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792316607 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.161

A160 ESTIMATION OF FIBROSIS PROGRESSION RATES FOR CHRONIC HEPATITIS C: UPDATED META-ANALYSIS AND META-REGRESSION

2018· article· en· W2792316607 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ayşegül Erman, Joanna Bielecki, Jordan J. Feld, Murray Krahn, Ran Thein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisMedicineInternal medicineCirrhosisMeta-regressionRandom effects modelHepatitis CConfidence intervalChronic liver diseaseMEDLINEBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic Hepatitis C viral infection (HCV) is a leading cause of cirrhosis, liver failure, and transplantation. The accurate estimation of HCV-disease progression is essential for evaluating the cost effectiveness of treatment and determining treatment prioritization. The purpose of this study was to obtain updated progression rate estimates (FPRs; i.e., pooled annual transition probabilities) of hepatic fibrosis in individuals with chronic HCV infection and to evaluate the impact of covariates on disease progression though an updated systematic review of the evidence, meta-analysis and meta-regression. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. The search covered a period of January 1990 to August 2014 with no language limit and was supplemented by reference and citation searches. In general, the review included peer-reviewed studies which examine hepatic fibrosis progression in HCV-infected individuals. Stage-specific annual transition probabilities (F0→1, F1→2 F2→3, F3→4) were estimated using the Markov Maximum Likelihood estimation method. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool FPRs. The impact of covariates on FPRs was explored through random effects meta-regression analyses. Time-to-cirrhosis was estimated using the pooled FPRs. Overall, the systematic review included a total of 130 studies involving 160 groups of HCV-infected individuals (N=55,581). The update contributed more subjects from non-clinical settings, injection drug users (IDUs), blood donor populations and genotype-1 and -3 infected groups. The pooled stage-specific FPRs were F0→1: 0.113 (95%CI, 0.103–0.123); F1→2: 0.087 (95%CI, 0.079–0.096); F2→3:0.120 (95%CI, 0.110–0.131); F3→4: 0.116 (95%CI, 0.105–0.128). Based on meta-regression analyses (Table 1), a longer duration of infection, and genotype-1 infection were independently associated with a slower progression, whereas male gender and blood transfusion were associated with faster progression with at least one FPR. Relative to liver clinic populations, pediatric and IDU populations also displayed a faster rate of progression for at least one transition rate. The estimated unadjusted time-to-cirrhosis was 37 years for all groups, 36 for patients identified in a clinical setting, 48 for non-clinical settings, 59 for genotype-1 and 30 years for genotype-3 groups. The current study provides updated estimates of FPRs associated with chronic HCV, explores covariates associated with progression and provides more precise progression estimates for specific patient populations. These estimates should allow for more accurate estimation of the cost-effectiveness of new HCV antivirals and alternative prevention strategies targeting different groups of patients. Table 1. Random-effects meta-regression of covariates associated with hepatic fibrosis progression. Linear mixed model-maximum likelihood method. *Log stage-specific transition probabilities. †Proportion. Values in bold indicate statistical significance. Abbreviations: β: coefficient; SE: standard error; CHC: chronic hepatitis C; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; RNA: ribonucleic acid. I2: the proportion of variability in transition probabilities due to heterogeneity vs. sampling error; R2: the proportion of heterogeneity explained by covariates in the model. Canadian Network on Hepatitis C

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.079
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207