MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792336045 · doi:10.21037/aes.2018.ab091

AB091. A novel method for the measurement of pulsatile choroidal blood flow based on video-rate OCT imaging and automated segmentation of the choroid: description and reproducibility

2018· article· en· W2792336045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Eye Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulsatile flowReproducibilityChoroidSegmentationBlood flowMedicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRadiologyCardiologyMathematicsPsychologyNeuroscienceRetina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Over the years, a variety of non-invasive techniques have been developed to allow the measurement of blood flow in living human eyes. However, none of the existing techniques has yet been adopted in clinical practice due to their limitations and lack of standardization. Moreover, no reliable technique is currently available to measure the pulsatile choroidal blood flow (PCBF). We propose a novel method based on video-rate optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and automated segmentation to measure the pulsatile component of choroidal blood flow in vivo, and demonstrate its repeatability. Methods: Adapted from our earlier work (Beaton et al.), this method uses video-rate OCT with enhanced depth imaging and automated segmentation of the choroid to measure the pulsatile choroidal volume change. Imaging is carried out at the fundus for less than a minute at 7 Hz. In each frame, choroidal thickness (CT) is measured by a segmentation algorithm based on graph cuts using an edge-probability weighting scheme. The algorithm computes the CT change corresponding to choroidal filling over the time-series and subsequently derives the pulsatile choroidal volume change through an approximate model of the eye. Fifty-eight subjects were recruited from the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital and PCBF was measured twice in one eye within the same session and by a single examiner. Repeatability was assessed using the Bland-Altman plot and Intraclass correlation coefficient as calculated with SPSS. Results: Two measurements of PCBF were successfully obtained for each eye using our technique. The average measures ICC for choroidal volume change was 0.929 (95% CI, 0.881, 0.958), showing good to excellent repeatability. The Bland-Altman plot and Pearson coefficient (r=0.840, P<0.001) showed agreement and a strong correlation respectively between intra-session measurement of OR in all examined eyes. Conclusions: This study confirms the high repeatability of pulsatile choroidal blood flow measurements obtained with our optical method, allowing further investigation of blood flow in ocular diseases such as glaucoma and AMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it