P186 Outcomes of maintenance ustekinumab therapy for Crohn’s disease based on inflammatory burden: A post-hoc analysis of the UNITI trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patient inflammatory burden has been postulated to predict response to anti-inflammatory therapies. Ustekinumab(UST) is the only approved anti-IL-12/23 mAb for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) and the PBO-controlled UNITI registration trials present an opportunity to test this hypothesis. We evaluated clinical outcomes to 90 mg q8 and q12wk SC treatment strategies based on inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (fCal). In UNITI 1 (anti-TNF therapy failures) and UNITI 2 (conventional therapy failures), patients were randomised to PBO, UST 130 mg IV, or UST ~6mg/kg IV. At 8weeks, all responders to IV induction therapy participated in IM-UNITI and were randomised to SC maintenance treatment with PBO, UST 90 mg q8wks, or UST 90 mg q12wks. Clinical endpoints were assessed after 44 weeks of maintenance therapy. Results were stratified by inflammatory burden based on CRP and fCal. For CRP, inflammatory burden categories used were ≤5, >5 and ≤10, and >10 mg/l. For fCal, inflammatory burden categories used were <250 and ≥250 mg/kg. When patients were stratified by inflammatory burden at baseline (BL) of induction (i.e. before IV dose), CRP thresholds discriminated patients in the 90 mg q12wk group into those more or less likely to achieve clinical endpoints at wk44 of maintenance. This finding is also supported by fCal stratification at BL of induction (i.e. before IV dose).Stratification at BL of maintenance provides greater distinction between UST doses. Maintenance week44 results stratified by CRP are shown in Figure 1. They suggest that a CRP >10 mg/l at maintenance BL (i.e. before first SC dose) discriminates a high inflammatory burden population that benefited from UST 90 mg SC q8wk dosing vs. q12wk dosing. Response and remission rates were similar between UST SC q8wk and q12wk dosing in patients with maintenance BL CRP ≤5mg/l and between 5and10 mg/l. Similar effects were seen at maintenance wk44 endpoints using fCal (Figure 2). Those with a higher inflammatory burden(fCal >250 mg/kg) at maintenance BL more clearly separated from PBO in q8wk group(56.4% vs. 33.8% remission, p = 0.002) vs. q12wk group (46.1% vs. 33.8% remission, p = 0.065). CD patients with low inflammatory burden based on biomarkers CRP and fCal at BL and/or at initiation of maintenance therapy can benefit from q8 or q12wk maintenance dosing with UST, while those with high inflammatory burden are likely to need q8wk to maintain benefit. Clinical endpoints at week 44 of IM-UNITI, stratified by baseline CRP Clinical endpoints at week 44 of IM-UNITI, stratified by baseline fecal calprotectin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".