High‐order energy‐preserving schemes for the improved Boussinesq equation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes a class of high‐order energy‐preserving schemes for the improved Boussinesq equation. To derive the energy‐preserving schemes, we first discretize the improved Boussinesq equation by Fourier pseudospectral method, which leads to a finite‐dimensional Hamiltonian system. Then, the obtained semidiscrete system is solved by Hamiltonian boundary value methods, which is a newly developed class of energy‐preserving methods. The proposed schemes can reach spectral precision in space, and in time can reach second‐order, fourth‐order, and sixth‐order accuracy, respectively. Moreover, the proposed schemes can conserve the discrete mass and energy to within machine precision. Furthermore, to show the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed methods, the proposed methods are compared with the finite difference methods and the finite volume element method. The results of several numerical experiments are given for the propagation of the single solitary wave, the interaction of two solitary waves and the wave break‐up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it