MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792462695 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.187

A186 INVESTIGATION OF THE PROTECTIVE ROLE OF MIR-122 AGAINST CELLULAR SENSORS OF RNA AT THE 5’ TERMINUS OF HEPATITIS C VIRUS GENOME

2018· article· en· W2792462695 on OpenAlexaff
Annie Bernier, Yalena Amador, Selena M. Sagan, Joyce A. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein kinase RRNARNA silencingBiologyHepatitis C virusmicroRNAVirologyRIG-IRNA virusRNA interferenceCell biologyRNA-binding proteinVirusMolecular biologyProtein kinase AKinaseGeneGeneticsMitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 200 million individuals worldwide are infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV). MicroRNA-122 (miR-122) is a highly abundant liver-specific miRNA shown to interact at two miRNA-binding sites in the 5’ end of the HCV genome. This unusual interaction promotes HCV RNA accumulation in both HCV-infected cells and the livers of infected patients. Previous investigation of the stabilization of HCV RNA by miR-122 shows a slowed rate of decay in cells supplemented with miR-122 duplexes. Recent findings demonstrate that miR-122 protects HCV RNA from degradation by exoribonucleases. These results support a model whereby miR-122 acts to shield the 5’ terminus of the viral RNA, preventing its degradation or recognition by nucleases or cellular sensors of RNA. Protein kinase R (PKR) is activated mainly by long dsRNA, but short RNA stem-loops can activate PKR in a 5’ triphosphate-dependent manner, suggesting that the 3’ overhang created by miR-122 binding to the HCV 5’ end may also prevent recognition of HCV by PKR. In addition, the LGP2 protein is another RIG-I-like receptor that binds to dsRNA and acts as an on/off switch for RIG-I signaling. We hypothesize that miR-122 forms a distinct complex with host and/or viral proteins that together protect the HCV 5’ terminus from recognition by cellular sensors of RNA, such as PKR and LGP2. Herein, we are investigating a protective role for miR-122 against these cellular sensors of RNA. We are inhibiting PKR and LGP2 expression by siRNA knockdown in Huh7.5 cells, in the presence or absence of miR-122. To investigate the stabilization of the viral RNA in this context, we are montitoring viral RNA accumulation by luciferase assay and northern blot analyses. To investigate the contribution of miR-122, we are using miR-122 site mutants or sequestering miR-122 using an antisense locked nucleic acid inhibitor. We demonstrate that LGP2 expression is increased early during HCV infection in Huh7.5 cells. Knockdown of PKR or LGP2 in the presence of miR-122 has no significant effect on HCV RNA accumulation. Our current focus is on elucidating the effect of PKR and LGP2 knockdown on HCV RNA accumulation in miR-122 site mutants under limited miR-122 conditions or during miR-122 sequestration. We expect that the results will reveal whether miR-122 binding to the 5’ terminus of HCV is protective against recognition by the cellular sensors of RNA, PKR and LGP2 and together with our collaborators in the Wilson lab, we are investigating the role of several other sensors of RNA, including IFIT-1, IFIT-5, RIG-I and MAVS. These results will provide insights into whether miR-122 binding to the HCV genome protects the viral RNA from recognition by cellular sensors of RNA and has implications for the mechanisms of miR-122 mediated promotion of HCV RNA accumulation. CIHRCanHepC, FRSQ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207