MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792470604 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.082

A81 POOLED SAFETY ANALYSIS FROM THE USTEKINUMAB CROHN’S DISEASE AND PSORIATIC DISEASES PHASE 2 AND 3 TRIALS

2018· article· en· W2792470604 on OpenAlexaff
Brian G. Feagan, B E Sands, W de Villiers, Elyssa Ott, Christopher Gasink, Yinghua Lang, Philippe Szapary, Subrata Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabPsoriatic arthritisAdverse effectSafety profileInternal medicinePsoriasisMaceMethotrexateSurgeryDermatologyDiseaseInfliximab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ustekinumab (UST) is well-established in psoriasis (PsO) & psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with up to 5 years safety data from psoriasis clinical trials with 3117 pts & 8998 patient years (PY). However, limited safety data have been presented in Crohn’s disease (CD). In CD, Phase 2/3 data show that UST is safe & effective. Here we present CD safety data & compare it to safety from psoriatic diseases. Safety data from 5 CD (2 Ph2/3Ph3) trials were analyzed with the previously reported PsO (1 Ph2/3Ph3) & PsA (1 Ph2/2 Ph3) trials. Psoriatic pts received UST 45 or 90mg SC; Ph3 CD pts received one IV UST dose (130mg or ~6 mg/kg) then 90mg SC q8w or q12w. Permitted concurrent treatments differed by indication: PsO – none; PsA – methotrexate; CD - immunosuppressives & corticosteroids. All pts who received ≥1 dose of UST were included. Outcomes are presented as events per 100 PY. In the PBO-control period, 3636 pts received UST (1582 PsO, 692 PsA & 1362 CD). Treated pts with ≥1 reported event PBO vs UST in pooled indications (events/100 PY): AEs 556.1 vs 594.3; SAEs 19.5 vs16.4; infections 135.8 vs138.1; serious infections 2.9 vs 3.3; MACE 0.26 vs 0.60; malignancies 0.26 vs 0.12; deaths 0 vs 0.12. Through 1 year, 5884 pts received UST (3117 PsO, 1018 PsA, & 1749 CD) over 4521 PY. Rates of AEs, SAEs, & infections were similar between UST & PBO (Table) across all groups. Event rates in the combined CD studies were also similar between groups with more frequent overall AEs, & infections in CD pts. UST has a favorable safety profile in CD with one IV induction dose up to 6mg/kg & SC maintenance up to 90mg q8wks. Evaluation of the CD experience did not alter the safety profile of UST established in pts with psoriatic disease treated up to 5 years. Key safety events through 1yr aAssessed by investigator, b incl UST 1, 3, 4.5, or 6mg/kg IV; 130mg IV, SC 90mg; c1 MACE: subarachnoid hemorrhage due to aneurysm rupture; d4 events in 3 pts: 1 multiple myeloma, 1 adenocarcinoma & incidental carcinoid tumor; 1 prostate cancer Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.020
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207