MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792539170

Disability and Social Equality: The Centrality of Independent Living

2018· article· en· W2792539170 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sandra Carpenter

Bibliographic record

VenueAlternate routes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentralityIndependent livingSociologyPolitical scienceMathematicsGerontologyMedicineCombinatorics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I have been struggling for equality for over 30 Years.When I was born in Ottawa, in the 1950s, children with disabilities were either kept at home with their parents, or sent to live in a state or charitably run "home".Although I was born with my disability, I wasn't actually diagnosed until I was 3 years old and subjected to a gamut of medical tests at a charitable hospital in Montreal.In the 50's Medicare did not exist, so as a charitable hospital, I was able to receive diagnostic testing that my family could not otherwise afford.When my sister was born, four years after me, she was eventually diagnosed with the same disability as me: Spinal Muscular Atrophy which is a type of Muscular Dystrophy.I remember going to a "regular" school; a right which my Mom had to fight for with the local board of education.And then because of ongoing difficulties with me getting the support I needed to be really integrated in regular school, for example with accessible transportation or washroom assistance, I was sent to the "Crippled Children's School".At first, I was taxied to this school, but after a couple of years of going there, I was deemed ineligible for this "special program" because my disability "didn't improve with therapy".So there I was.The regular school wouldn't let me in, and neither would the "segregated" school.The only recourse was home teaching, which was paid for by the board of education.Mom was starting to panic about what was becoming an increasingly isolated and under-stimulated life.She regarded us both (me and my sister) as "smart" and "needing to use our brains".She worried about a future where neither of us would have the education to get into Highschool or University which would lead to a job.Although she wouldn't have been aware of any higher-level analysis at the time, her instincts were right on.If a child with a disability experiences inequity right from the start in terms of education then inequality follows them 1 Sandra Carpenter was born with a disability in Ottawa in the 1950s.She has been actively involved with the evolution of services and supports for people with primarily physical disabilities most of her life.She is currently the Executive Director of the Centre for Independent Living in Toronto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.037
Scholarly communication0.0110.012
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAlternate routes→Same topicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→