MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792546237 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.154

A153 MEASURING QUALITY OF LIFE AND DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS RECEIVING INDUCTION THERAPY OF EXCLUSIVE ENTERAL NUTRITION OR CORTICOSTEROIDS FOR ACTIVE INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2018· article· en· W2792546237 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lara Hart, Yasamin Farbod, Camilla Halgren, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Mary Zachos, Nikhil Pai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseEnteral administrationParenteral nutritionDiseaseInduction therapyQuality of life (healthcare)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic illness that can affect a child’s physical, social and psychological well-being. Studies have shown that active IBD is associated with lower quality of life (QOL) scores in children. Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) and corticosteroids (CS) are effective treatment options for induction of remission in pediatric Crohn’s disease (CD), while CS is effective for ulcerative colitis (UC). EEN, however, is often poorly utilized due to perceived increased treatment burden. Two studies have shown that QOL in children receiving EEN is significantly better at the end of therapy compared to baseline. However, no studies have assessed the effects of EEN therapy on QOL longitudinally during treatment, or against other IBD treatment options. To determine if there is a difference in longitudinal QOL scores in pediatric CD and UC patients receiving an 8-week course of EEN versus CS therapy. This prospective cohort study involved patients 5–18 years old with IBD, followed up at McMaster Children’s Hospital (Hamilton, Ontario). Patients were included if they received EEN (Peptamen® 1.5) or CS therapy for induction of remission of moderate to severe CD or UC. All patients received 8 weeks of treatment. QOL was assessed using the KIDSCREEN-10 index. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI), or the modified Pediatric CD Activity Index (PCDAI). QOL and disease activity indices were assessed weekly during induction therapy, and 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Disease activity markers (albumin, CRP, fecal calprotectin) were also assessed during the course of induction therapy. 31 patients were enrolled. 17 patients received induction therapy with EEN and 14 with CS. In CD patients, as PCDAI decreased, QOL significantly increased (R=-0.41; p<0.001). Similar significant trends were seen in UC patients (R=-0.345; p=0.042). There was a small, but significant difference in QOL between the children on CS (higher QOL) and those on EEN of 2.24 points using the KIDSCREEN 10 index (95% CI 0.34–4.15; p=0.021). For the children on EEN or CS, an increase in QOL significantly correlated with a decrease in CRP levels (R=-0.271; p=0.041), however, such a correlation was not seen with albumin or fecal calprotectin. Pediatric IBD patients receiving treatment for induction of remission experience an increase in quality of life as disease activity and CRP decreased. While there is a significantly higher QOL in patients on CS compared to EEN, the difference is small, and physicians and families should still consider the benefits of EEN therapy and its superior side-effect profile when choosing therapy for induction of remission. CAG

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207