MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792563641 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.051

A51 RARE CAUSES OF DYSPHAGIA: A CASE SERIES

2018· article· en· W2792563641 on OpenAlexaff
E Y Liu, Erik Vantomme, S Bhasin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDysphagiaOdynophagiaEpiglottisSurgeryEtiologyRadiologyLarynxInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dysphagia is the sensation of difficulty swallowing and is a common clinical problem that warrants prompt evaluation, diagnosis, and management. Dysphagia has a large differential diagnosis including mechanical obstruction and neurological pathology. We aim to report a series of unusual cases of dysphagia to remind readers to have an index of suspicion for atypical etiologies of dysphagia. Three cases were identified in clinical practice and included in this case series. Case 1 A 61-year-old male presents with a 4-month history of progressive solid and liquid oropharyngeal dysphasia and 20-pound weight loss. Nasopharyngeal laryngoscopy and gastroscopy did not reveal structural abnormality. CT neck and chest showed diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).The C3-4 osteophyte formed a shelf-like projection anteriorly measuring up to 1.8 cm which compressed the posterior hypopharynx at the level of the epiglottis, likely impeding epiglottic inversion (Fig. 1a). The patient tolerated percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion with no complications and will seek surgical consultation for treatment of DISH. Case 2 A 30 year-old female snowboarder fell 15 feet onto hard-packed snow and sustained soft tissue injuries to her left hip and chest wall. Forty-eight hours later, she developed retrosternal pleuritic chest pain and progressive dysphagia and odynophagia. CT chest/abdomen showed no abnormalities; however, gastroscopy revealed several partial-thickness esophageal tears with visible muscle fibers just above the gastroesophageal junction (Fig. 1b). She was treated conservatively for 3 days with NPO, intravenous pantoprazole and intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam with no complications. Case 3 A 72-year-old female presented with dysphagia, odynophagia and melena stool. She had a thoracic stent graft exclusion of a ruptured thoracic aneurysm 2 months ago, which was complicated post-operatively by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and thoracic epidural abscess. CT angiography showed type 1 endoleak at the inferior margin of the thoracic aortic stent. Gastroscopy showed a bleeding aortoesophageal fistula (Fig. 1c). Due to patient frailty no further surgery was recommended and she was offered palliative treatment. Dysphagia is a non-specific clinical symptom that has a broad differential diagnosis. The workup of dysphagia must be focused to the patient’s history; in these three cases, a rare diagnosis was considered in the clinical context and appropriate management was promptly initiated. In order to make these diagnoses, there must be an index of suspicion for uncommon causes of dysphagia. This case series reminds the clinician that patients can present with time-sensitive and life threatening disease with a primary symptom of dysphagia, and consideration for uncommon etiologies is crucial in delivering prompt management to these patients. Figure 1. a) 61-year-old male with DISH presents with oropharyngeal dysphagia due to prominent C3-4 osteophyte projecting anteriorly and compressing the posterior hypopharynx. b) 30 year-old female with dysphagia and odynophagia due to isolated partial-thickness esophageal tears from deceleration injury. c) 72-year-old female with dysphagia and odynophagia secondary to aortoesophageal fistula due to infected thoracic aortic stent graft. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207