Finding reliable phenotypes and detecting artefacts among <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> assays to characterize the refractory transcriptional activator Sxy (TfoX) in <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Sxy (TfoX) protein is required for expression of a distinct subset of the genes regulated by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) in the model organisms Escherichia coli , Haemophilus influenzae , and Vibrio cholerae . Genetic studies have established that CRP and Sxy co-activate transcription at gene promoters containing DNA binding sites called CRP-S sites. In contrast, CRP acts without Sxy at gene promoters containing canonical CRP-N sites, suggesting that Sxy makes physical contacts with CRP and/or DNA to assist in transcriptional activation at CRP-S promoters. Despite growing interest in Sxy’s activity as a transcription factor, Sxy remains poorly characterized due to a lack of reliable phenotypes in E. coli . Experiments are further hampered by growth inhibition and formation of inclusion bodies when Sxy is overexpressed. In this study we applied diverse phenotypic and molecular assays to test for postulated Sxy functions and interactions. Mutations in conserved regions of Sxy and truncations in the Sxy C-terminus abolish transcriptional activation of a CRP-S promoter, and a 37 amino acid truncation of the C-terminus relieves the growth inhibition normally caused by Sxy overexpression. Sxy was unable to augment weakened CRP interactions to restore carbon metabolism phenotypes. Bandshift analysis and chromatin pull-down assays of Sxy-CRP-DNA interactions yielded intriguing evidence of CRP-Sxy and Sxy-DNA physical interactions. However, despite the careful application of standard protein purification protocols and quality control steps for nickel affinity column purification, protein mass spectrometry revealed the enrichment of additional DNA-binding proteins in nickel column eluates, presenting a probable source of artefactual protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction results. These findings highlight the importance of extensive controls and phenotypic assays for the study of poorly characterized and recalcitrant proteins like Sxy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".