MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792645109 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.081

A80 ENDOSCOPIC HEALING WITH USTEKINUMAB IN CROHN’S DISEASE: THE UNITI ENDOSCOPY SUB-STUDY

2018· article· en· W2792645109 on OpenAlexaff
Brian G. Feagan, William J. Sandborn, Christopher Gasink, Daphne Chan, Yinghua Lang, P Pollack, S. B. Hanauer, Douglas C. Wolf, Jewel Johanns, Philippe Szapary, P. Rutgeerts

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationClinical endpointRandomized controlled trialGastroenterologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To evaluate endoscopic healing in the ustekinumab (UST) induction (UNITI-1&2) & maintenance (IM-UNITI) phase 3 studies. Substudy patients (pts) had colonoscopies at baseline (UNITI Wk0), then 8 & 52 weeks later (IM-UNITI Wk44). Video-endoscopies were centrally read by a single blinded reader for ulcerations & SES-CD. In UNITI, pts received one IV dose (UST 130mg, UST ~6mg/kg, or PBO). Pts with clinical response [CR] (CDAI drop≥100) in UNITI were re-randomized to subcutaneous (SC) PBO or UST 90mg (q12w or q8w) [primary randomized IM-UNITI population]. Non-randomized pts were added to the pooled IM-UNITI population: UST IV non-responders - SC UST 90mg, then SC UST 90mg q8w if in CR 8wks later; PBO IV non-responders - UST IV 130mg, then SC UST 90mg q12w if in CR 8wks later; PBO induction responders - PBO throughout. Pts required SES-CD ≥3 at UNITI Wk0 to be included. Primary outcome: Change in SES-CD at UNITI Wk8 (combined UST vs PBO). IM-UNITI Wk44 efficacy was evaluated for both the IM-UNITI populations. At wk8, UST reduced SES-CD significantly more vs PBO. Results were similar across UST doses, studies, & other endpoints (Table 1a). At IM-UNITI Wk44, in the primary randomized IM-UNITI population trends favoured UST vs PBO maintenance (especially UST 90mg q8w) but small sample sizes (UST n=46; PBO n=24) limited conclusions. In the post-hoc pooled IM-UNITI population (Table 1b), trends supporting UST maintenance were favourable, especially 90mg q8w. The endoscopy substudy primary endpoint was met: One IV UST dose significantly reduced SES-CD vs PBO, as early as Wk8. More pts receiving UST maintenance achieved wk44 endpoints vs PBO. These data support efficacy of UST in inducing & maintaining endoscopic healing in CD. (Table 1a) Week 8 Results from UNITI-1/2 (Table 1b) IM-UNITI Week 44 Results *P ˂0.05 §Primary endpoint 1SES-CD reduction ≥3 from UNITI BL 2SES-CD reduction ≥50% from UNITI BL 3SES-CD ≤2 4No ulcerations Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→