A simple greenhouse experiment to explore the effect of cryogenic water extraction for tracing plant source water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Stable isotopes of water ( 2 H and 18 O) are useful tracers for determining root water uptake depths. In such studies, plant and soil water are extracted most commonly by cryogenic vacuum distillation. However, recent studies have suggested that cryogenic extraction conditions (extraction time, temperature, and vacuum) and soil physicochemical properties affect the isotopic composition of extracted soil water. Here, we perform a simple greenhouse trial with 2 plant species ( Taraxacum officinale and Pelargonium spp.) in 2 soil types (clayey loam and sand) to test our ability to match plant water to its putative soil water source(s) by using different extraction conditions (30–240 min, 80–200 °C, 0.1 Pa). We irrigated plants with water of known isotopic composition, sampled root crowns and soils at 2 depths, and varied the cryogenic water extraction conditions. Our isotope results from the sandy soils were unaffected by cryogenic extraction conditions. In contrast, extraction parameters affected the isotope composition of waters recovered from clayey soil. This influenced the estimates of plant water sourcing, where δ 2 H and δ 18 O returned different results from each other. With higher extraction temperatures and longer extraction times, we gradually extracted more enriched soil water, which reflected the source water of both plant species. Our results imply that longer extraction times and temperatures for clayey soils are needed to reduce fractionation effects during the extraction procedure. Future studies should explore how these effects apply to natural clay‐rich soils as well as plant tissue isotope composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".