MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792654304

Application of a methodological advance to calculate 3D flow fields in river channel junctions

2018· article· en· W2792654304 on OpenAlexaff
Gelare Moradi, Bart Vermeulen, Colin D. Rennie, Romain Cardot, Stuart N. Lane

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Twente Research Information · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcoustic Doppler current profilerHomogeneity (statistics)GeologyFlow (mathematics)FluvialHomogeneousChannel (broadcasting)Flow velocityDoppler effectHydrology (agriculture)Current (fluid)GeodesyMechanicsGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsOceanographyStructural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic Doppler current profiler (aDcp) vessel-mounted flow measurements are now commonly used to quantify discharge and velocity in shallow water fluvial environments. Here, we consider the benefits of improving secondary circulation estimates in river confluences through the manner in which moving vessel aDcp data are handled. Secondary circulation in Alpine river confluences involves a rotational movement of flow, orthogonal to the main flow. It results in a spatial and temporal variation of fluid motion and a relatively high level of morphological change. It is well established that measuring such flows requires repeated surveys at the same cross-section. However, less attention has been given to how to process these data. Most techniques used to process vessel-mounted aDcp data use the assumption of homogeneity between the measured radial components of velocity. This assumption can be problematic where acoustic beams diverge with distance from the aDcp probe. Divergence between the beams increases the volume in which the flow must be assumed homogeneous. In the presence of secondary circulation cells, and where there are strong rates of shear in the flow, the homogeneity assumption may not apply, especially deeper in the water column. To reduce the volume assumed homogeneous, a method proposed by Vermeulen et al. (2014) has been applied for the first application to Sontek Riversurveyor data, collected in medium sized (∼60 m wide) gravel-bed river confluences. The method combines radial velocities in a predefined mesh, based on their position. In this paper, we present the results of this method and compare them with more conventional data processing approaches. The proposed method suggests an improvement in secondary flow cell representation, comparing to more conventional methods whilst also confirming that repeated transects are required to achieve meaningful secondary flow and turbulence estimation. Use of this method resolves two counter-rotating cells in the confluence zone more clearly, with downward velocity in the channel centre. This pattern helps to explain the development of confluence scour holes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Twente Research InformationSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207