MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792668629 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.166

A166 THE LONG-LIVED ANTI-COLITIC EFFECT OF ADOPTIVE TRANSFER OF INTERLEUKIN-4 EDUCATED MACROPHAGES

2018· article· en· W2792668629 on OpenAlexafffund
A Wang, Gabriella Leung, Adam Shute, Derek M. McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsColitisAdoptive cell transferHistopathologyInterleukin 4InterleukinImmunologyTrophyInterleukin 10ChemistryPharmacologyInternal medicineMedicineCytokinePathologyT cellImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Postulating that cellular immunotherapy could be used to treat IBD, we showed that intraperitoneal (ip) injection of murine bone-marrow derived macrophages (BMDM) treated with IL-4 (M(IL4), i.e. alternatively activated macrophages), reduced the severity of dinitrobenzene sulphonic acid (DNBS)-induced colitis. Here we investigated the longevity of this response and queried a role for the microbiota in the inhibition of colitis evoked by the adoptive transfer of M(IL4)s. BMDM were treated with IL-4 (20 ng/mL, 48h) and 106 M(IL4)s were given to Balb/c mice (n=5–21, 1–3 experiments) by ip. injection 2, 5, 8 or 14 days prior to intra-rectal (ir) delivery of 3 mg of DNBS. Three days post-DNBS, mice were necropsied and disease severity assessed by macroscopic and histological disease scores. Other mice received a 1-week broad spectrum antibiotic (Abx) regimen in their drinking water and DNBS ± M(IL4)s 2 days prior to the DNBS. DNBS-treated mice consistently displayed loss of body weight, shortening of the colon, significant histopathology and disease activity scores (DAS) of 3.6 ± 0.9 (mean±SD, n=21; max. score is 5). M(IL4)s given 2 days prior to DNBS suppressed colitis, and remarkably mice treated with M(IL4)s 14 days before ir. DNBS were equally protected (DAS=1.5 ± 0.9, n=7), although some mice still displayed significant histopathology. In addition, M(IL4)s (2-day pretreatment) failed to ameliorate DNBS-induced colitis in mice concomitantly treated with antibiotics (DAS: control = 0 ± 8; DNBS = 3.6 ± 1.3; DNBS+M(IL4) = 0.9 ± 1.2; DBNS+M(IL4)+Abx = 3.3 ± 1.2; n=8–12, 3 experiments). These data provide proof-of-concept support for M(IL4) immunotherapy to treat colitis and suggest that each treatment could protect the individual for a considerable period of time. There are caveats with the use of antibiotics, nevertheless, these preliminary findings suggest that consideration of the gut microbiota may be needed in the translation of M(IL4) therapy for a targeted cohort of patients with IBD. CCC, CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicImmune Response and Inflammation→French-language works237,207→