MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792726447 · doi:10.29103/tj.v7i2.134

STUDI KOMPARASI BASE SHEAR PADA GEDUNG MENGGUNAKAN BASE ISOLATOR DAN NON BASE ISOLATOR

2018· article· id· W2792726447 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Ridho Siagian, Wesli Wesli, Yovi Chandra, Said Jalalul Akbar

Bibliographic record

VenueTeras Jurnal Jurnal Teknik Sipil · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsolatorPhysicsStructural engineeringBase (topology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perencanaan struktur gedung di Indonesia masih minim dalam penggunaan base isolator pada wilayah gempa kuat seperti Aceh. Penelitian ini mengkombinasikan antara base isolator dan Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus (SRPMK) sebagai sistem penahan gaya gempa di wilayah gempa kuat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui besarnya perbandingan respon gempa struktur fixed base SRPMK dan struktur SRPMK base isolator pada bangunan tingkat 10. Kedua struktur di analisis dengan spectrum respon dan data gempa yang digunakan adalah data gempa kota Banda Aceh dengan bantuan program Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Buliding Systems (ETABS) 2016. Respon struktur yang ditinjau adalah gaya geser dasar (base shear), waktu getar alami, perpindahan (displacement), simpangan antar lantai (interstory drift) dan kapasitas penampang kolom tepi dan tengah pada struktur base isolator SRPMK. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh gaya geser dasar struktur fixed base sebesar 9677,44 kN arah x dan 9649,26 kN arah y sedangkan struktur base isolator 5871,16 kN arah x dan 5854,27 kN arah y, kemudian hasil waktu getar alami struktur fixed base sebesar 1,178 detik dan struktur base isolator 2,277 detik, dan hasil simpangan antar lantai paling besar terletak di lantai 2 struktur base isolator yaitu 18,948% mereduksi simpangan antar lantai fixed base dan struktur memenuhi peraturan SNI 03-1726-2012 untuk penggunaan isolasi yaitu 46,51 mm. Kapasitas penampang kolom struktur fixed base pada lokasi pinggir yaitu 0,292 dan 0,427 pada lokasi tengah sedangkan nilai kapasitas penampang kolom struktur base isolator pada lokasi pinggir yaitu 0284 dan 0,374 pada lokasi tengah. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh bahwa penggunaan base isolator dapat mereduksi gaya geser arah x mencapai 40% dan arah y mencapai 39%, kemudian dapat memperpanjang waktu getar alami struktur bangunan dua kali. Hal ini menyebabkan gaya gempa yang bekerja semakin kecil dan dimensi kolom dapat diperkecil. Kata Kunci : SRPMK Base isolator, Analisis respon spektrum, ETABS 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeras Jurnal Jurnal Teknik SipilSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207