MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792726447 · doi:10.29103/tj.v7i2.134

STUDI KOMPARASI BASE SHEAR PADA GEDUNG MENGGUNAKAN BASE ISOLATOR DAN NON BASE ISOLATOR

2018· article· id· W2792726447 on OpenAlex
Ahmad Ridho Siagian, Wesli Wesli, Yovi Chandra, Said Jalalul Akbar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTeras Jurnal Jurnal Teknik Sipil · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsolatorPhysicsStructural engineeringBase (topology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Perencanaan struktur gedung di Indonesia masih minim dalam penggunaan <em>base </em>i<em>solator</em> pada wilayah gempa kuat seperti Aceh.<em> </em>Penelitian ini mengkombinasikan antara <em>base isolator</em> dan Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Khusus (SRPMK) sebagai sistem penahan gaya gempa di wilayah gempa kuat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui besarnya perbandingan respon gempa struktur <em>fixed base </em>SRPMK dan struktur SRPMK <em>base isolator</em> pada bangunan tingkat 10. Kedua struktur di analisis dengan <em>spectrum respon </em>dan data gempa yang digunakan adalah data gempa kota Banda Aceh dengan bantuan program <em>Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Buliding<strong> </strong>Systems </em>(ETABS) 2016. Respon struktur yang ditinjau adalah gaya geser dasar (<em>base shear)</em>, waktu getar alami, perpindahan (<em>displacement</em>), simpangan antar lantai (<em>interstory drift</em>) dan kapasitas penampang kolom tepi dan tengah pada struktur <em>base isolator</em> SRPMK. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh gaya geser dasar struktur <em>fixed base</em> sebesar 9677,44 kN arah x dan 9649,26 kN arah y sedangkan struktur <em>base isolator</em> 5871,16 kN arah x dan 5854,27 kN arah y, kemudian hasil waktu getar alami struktur <em>fixed base</em> sebesar 1,178 detik dan struktur <em>base isolator</em> 2,277 detik, dan hasil simpangan antar lantai paling besar terletak di lantai 2 struktur <em>base isolator</em> yaitu 18,948% mereduksi simpangan antar lantai <em>fixed base</em> dan struktur memenuhi peraturan SNI 03-1726-2012 untuk penggunaan <em>isolasi</em> yaitu 46,51 mm. Kapasitas penampang kolom struktur <em>fixed base </em>pada lokasi pinggir yaitu 0,292 dan 0,427 pada lokasi tengah sedangkan nilai kapasitas penampang kolom struktur <em>base isolator</em> pada lokasi pinggir yaitu 0284 dan 0,374 pada lokasi tengah. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh bahwa penggunaan <em>base isolator</em> dapat mereduksi gaya geser arah x mencapai 40% dan arah y mencapai 39%, kemudian dapat memperpanjang waktu getar alami struktur bangunan<em> </em>dua kali. Hal ini menyebabkan gaya gempa yang bekerja semakin kecil dan dimensi kolom dapat diperkecil.</p><p> </p>Kata Kunci <em>: SRPMK Base isolator, Analisis respon spektrum, ETABS 2016</em>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it