MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792798918 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.273

A273 THE CROHN’S DISEASE-ASSOCIATED PATHOBIONT ADHERENT-INVASIVE E. COLI (AIEC) INDUCES MITOCHONDRIAL FISSION IN EPITHELIAL CELLS IN ADVANCE OF APOPTOSIS

2018· article· en· W2792798918 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicole L. Mancini, A Wang, Jane Shearer, Derek M. McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMitochondrionMitochondrial fissionCell biologyApoptosismitochondrial fusionOrganelleFIS1Mitochondrial apoptosis-induced channelFragmentation (computing)CellProgrammed cell deathInner mitochondrial membraneMitochondrial DNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adherent-invasive E. coli are a putative etiological agent in a cohort of patients with Crohn’s disease. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been described in inflammatory bowel disease. Mitochondria are not distinct organelles; they exist as a dynamic network that constantly remodels via the processes of fission and fusion to meet the cells energy demands and allow recycling of damaged mitochondria. This is emerging as an area of interest in host-bacterial interaction but it is unknown if (and then how) infection with AIEC affects mitochondrial dynamics in epithelia and the consequences of this for the cell. Hypothesis: AIEC induce mitochondrial fragmentation in intestinal epithelial cells in an invasion-dependent manner that requires ROS, resulting in apoptosis and decreased epithelial barrier function. To explore the relationship between mitochondrial dynamics and epithelial function in vitro and determine if, then how, infection with AIEC affects mitochondrial dynamics and any consequence for epithelial barrier function. Human colon-derived epithelial lines were cultured with a non-invasive E. coli, AIEC (104–108 cfu; 4-16h), fixed (dead) AIEC, or spent medium from bacterial cultures. Epithelia were examined: (a) ATP levels; (b) live-cell imaging of mitochondria morphology and membrane potential with confocal microscopy; (c) immunoblotting of whole cell protein extracts for the mitochondrial fusion protein Optic Atrophy Factor 1 (OPA1) and Dynamin-Related Protein 1 (Drp1); (d) ROS neutralized by the antioxidants; and, (f) measurement of barrier function and apoptosis. AIEC infection resulted in reduced mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP, and dramatic mitochondrial fragmentation accompanied by OPA1 cleavage and recruitment of Drp1 to the mitochondria in gut epithelia in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The mitochondrial fragmentation was not reproduced by exposure to AIEC conditioned medium or fixed bacteria cells, and was not abrogated by treatment with a general (vitamin C) or a mitochondrial-specific (mitoTEMPO) anti-oxidant co-treatment. AIEC induced epithelial barrier loses, however preliminary trials with inhibitors of fission, Mdivi1 and P110, did not prevent the AIEC-induced drop in transepithelial resistance. Mitochondrial fragmentation preceded apoptosis in AIEC-infected epithelial cells. As a putative cause or contributor to Crohn’s disease, AIEC drive massive mitochondrial fragmentation in model gut epithelia independent of ROS generation or AIEC soluble factors. Epithelial cell apoptosis is a feature of AIEC infection, which may be a consequence of excessive mitochondrial fission, that would be predicted to compromise epithelial barrier function, potentiating or reactivating inflammatory disease. CCC, CIHRNSERC, University of Calgary Eyes High Funding

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→