Energy Level Alignment at Interfaces Between Au (111) and Thiolated Oligophenylenes of Increasing Chain Size: Theoretical Evidence of Pinning Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present a detailed theoretical characterization of the energetic alignment between the HOMO level of a series of thiolated oligophenylenes of increasing chain size, and the Fermi level of gold electrodes, using density functional theory (DFT) calculations for molecular self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) chemisorbed on an Au (111) surface, and the nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) formalism coupled to DFT for single molecule junctions. The additional role of the dynamic electronic polarization effects neglected in standard DFT calculations is also discussed. Interestingly, whereas the HOMO energy varies significantly among the unsubstituted oligomers in the gas phase, their alignment with respect to the Fermi level of the electrode is almost insensitive to chain size upon chemisorption, thus pointing to a strong pinning effect. The energy at which the HOMO is pinned strongly depends on the degree of interfacial hybridization, and hence on the contact geometry, as well as on the degree of surface coverage although a different mechanism enters into play.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".