MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792816885 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.007

A7 THE ROLE OF PROTEASE-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR-2 IN GIARDIA INDUCED DISRUPTIONS OF THE INTESTINAL MUCUS LAYER

2018· article· en· W2792816885 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Fekete, Christina Amat, Thibault Allain, M Saiffeddine, Morley D. Hollenberg, Kris Chadee, André G. Buret

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucusProteasesMucinBiologyProtease-activated receptor 2Mucin 2GiardiaProteaseReceptorGoblet cellMicrobiologyMolecular biologyGene expressionEpitheliumBiochemistryEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disruptions of the intestinal mucus barrier have been implicated in a variety of intestinal disorders. The mechanisms behind these disruptions remain unclear. We recently demonstrated that the enteric parasitic pathogen Giardia duodenalis alters the mucus layers of the small and large intestines at least in part via Giardia cysteine proteases. We hypothesized that goblet cell function and mucus disruptions are modulated by activation of protease activated receptor 2 (PAR2), which is highly expressed through the gastrointestinal tract, and is known to regulate mucus production in the airway and stomach. We aimed to determine whether Giardia’s cysteine proteases cleave and activate PAR2 on intestinal goblet cells, leading to modulation of their mucus producing activity. The human colonic epithelial cell line LS174T was used for in vitro mucus studies. The presence of functional PAR1 or PAR2 was assessed with calcium signaling assays using the specific activating peptides TFLLRN or 2fLIGRLO, respectively. MUC2 mucin gene expression was assessed through quantitative PCR (qPCR) in LS174T incubated with either Giardia trophozoites or activating peptides, and with pre-treatment of cells with the PAR2 antagonist p2Pal-218S pepducin. qPCR was also used to measure changes in PAR2 gene expression in response to Giardia. Wild type and PAR2 deficient mice were infected with Giardia trophozoites. The thickness of the mucus layer was measured by fluorescently staining mucus with fluorescein-coupled WGA, and expression of Muc2 and Muc5ac genes were determined using qPCR. LS174T express functional and responsive PAR2, but little or no PAR1. Treatment of cells with 2fLIGRLO (PAR2 agonist), but not TFLLRN (PAR1 agonist), increased MUC2 gene expression. Incubation of cells with Giardia trophozoites also increased MUC2 mRNA production, and this increase was abolished by pre-treatment of cells with a PAR2 antagonist. Giardia decreased PAR2 mRNA in LS174T. Giardia infection increased the expression of Muc2 and Muc5ac in the colon, and increased Muc5ac expression in the jejunum of wild-type mice compared to uninfected controls. In PAR2-/- mice, Giardia infection reduced the expression of Muc5ac, but not Muc2 in the jejunum, but did not affect gene expression in the colon. Giardia infection caused a thinning of the mucus layer in wild-type mice. In contrast, the infection induced a thickening of the mucus layer in PAR2-/- mice. Using a model of Giardia infection, the findings demonstrate that PAR2 plays a significant role in mucin gene regulation and function in mice and in a human colonic goblet cell line. CCCNSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207