MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792821734 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.106

A105 AN ONLINE EDUCATIONAL PORTAL IMPROVES CONCERNS OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS REGARDING PREGNANCY AND MEDICATION.

2018· article· en· W2792821734 on OpenAlexaff
Reed T. Sutton, Kelsey Wierstra, Lindsy Ambrosio, Levinus A. Dieleman, Brendan P. Halloran, Karen I. Kroeker, Richard N. Fedorak, Karen Wong, Keri-Ann Berga, Vivian Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsMacEwan UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyInflammatory bowel diseaseMcNemar's testContext (archaeology)Ulcerative colitisFertilityInternal medicineFamily medicineObstetricsDiseasePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of a mother’s chronic disease on fetal development makes dealing with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during pregnancy complicated. Almost 50% of women with IBD have poor reproductive knowledge; this has been associated with unsubstantiated concerns toward pregnancy, and towards IBD medications. With the help of Pixel Designs Company, we developed an educational web portal to address these concerns. To evaluate the educational web portal for effectiveness at improving pregnancy and medication concerns in IBD patients. IBD patients aged 18–45 years were invited to participate in a study to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational web portal covering the topics of heritability, fertility, surgery, pregnancy outcomes, delivery, postpartum, and breastfeeding in the context of IBD and IBD medications. Patients completed pre- and post-study questionnaires about seven IBD-specific pregnancy concerns, and identified Likert scores for nine medication concerns from the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ).The non-parametric McNemar’s test was used to determine if the proportion of patients who had each pregnancy concern decreased post-intervention. For medication concerns, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare median differences between Likert scores. 95% confidence intervals and SPSS Version 23 were used for all analysis. Seventy-eight of 111 patients (70.3%) completed pre and post-study questionnaires. Demographics for the 78 are as follows: median age 29.3 (IQR 25.6 - 32.9) years; 54 (69.2%) Crohn’s disease; 21 (26.9%) ulcerative colitis; 63 (80.3%) females, 5 (7.9%) currently pregnant and 19 (30.2%) previously pregnant. Medication history: 10 (12.8%) sulfasalazine, 67 (85.9%) mesalamine/5-ASAs, 17 (21.8%) budesonide, 63 (80.8%) steroids, 12 (15.4%) methotrexate, 55 (70.5%) azathioprine/mercaptopurine, 42 (53.8%) biologics, and 38 (48.7%) antibiotics. The intervention significantly decreased the proportion of patients who reported reproductive concerns regarding: fertility, added stress of raising a child affecting IBD, birth defects from IBD, pregnancy causing a flare-up, and inability to breastfeed due to IBD or medications. The BMQ Likert scores significantly decreased post intervention for concerns about having to take IBD medication, becoming too dependent on IBD medication, and the long-term effects of IBD medication. The educational web portal effectively reduced the proportion of patients who reported certain concerns about pregnancy in IBD, in addition to concerns regarding their IBD medications. AIHS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicPregnancy and Medication Impact→French-language works237,207→