MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792890139 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.653

P526 Early sonographic response predicts long-term outcome in Crohn’s disease: A prospective cohort study

2018· article· en· W2792890139 on OpenAlexaff
Kerri L. Novak, Jennifer Halasz, Cathy Lu, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Cynthia H. Seow, Divine Tanyingoh, Shane Devlin, Remo Panaccione, Stephanie R. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseProspective cohort studyInternal medicineAdalimumabCohortConfidence intervalDiseaseHyperaemiaCohort studySurgeryGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measures of early treatment response are shown to predict long-term outcomes in Crohn’s disease (CD). Early optimisation of therapy in CD may lead to better outcomes both early and late in the disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate ultrasound (US) response to induction treatment with adalimumab (ADA), with long-term follow-up to determine sonographic predictors of outcome. Prospective, single-centre cohort study in patients with known CD recruited from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014, having active CD with induction and maintenance therapy with ADA. Patients had US pre-treatment, at 3 and 6 months. Patients underwent pre-treatment ileocolonoscopy (IC) within 14 days of US. A subset had repeat IC at 6 months. The simple ultrasound score (SUS–based on bowel wall thickness and hyperaemia) and the Simple Endoscopic Score (SES)/Rutgeert’s score were recorded at each interval. Response at 6 months was characterised as complete, partial or non-response based on US parameters. Follow-up evaluated medical management, hospitalisation and surgery for 3 (maximum 6) years. There were 42 patients included, 62% (26 of 42) female, 38% (16 of 42) male with a mean age of 42 years (Table 1). Disease distribution: ileal 38% (16 of 42), 55% (23 of 42) ileocolonic and 7% (3 of 42) with colonic disease. All patients exhibited activity on US at baseline, with a mean SUS 3.15 (out of 4.63). SES was completed for 21 of 42 patients, mean 6.57, and Rutgeert’s score (10 of 42 patients) mean 3.20, while 19% were not amenable to endoscopic scoring (8 of 42) and 5% (2 of 42) had no baseline IC. At 6 months, 62% (26 of 42) were US responders, 10 of 26 with complete response (BWT ≤5mm). The remainder was not improved (38%). In the follow-up period, more complete responders than non-responders remained on ADA (p = 0.04), but partial responders and non-responders were not significantly different (p = 0.29). Surgery rate was 31% in non-responders, compared with 44% of partial responders (p = 0.72) and 10% of complete responders (p = 0.35). This patient however stopped medication before surgery with disease progression. Among all surgery patients, 85% (11 of 13) had severe disease on US with BWT ≥7mm and/or sonographic complications (strictures/penetrating complications). Early, robust sonographic response predicts long-term treatment success and surgical avoidance in patients with CD. The presence of complications on baseline US suggests a trend towards treatment failure and need for surgery. Future evaluation of inflammatory vs. stricturing/penetrating disease may be important.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→