MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792939190 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.055212

Experimental study of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>η</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> reaction with the A2 setup at the Mainz Microtron

2018· article· lv· W2792939190 on OpenAlexafffund
V. Sokhoyan, S. Prakhov, A. Fix, S. Abt, P. Achenbach, P. Adlarson, F. Afzal, P. Aguar-Bartolomé, Z. Ahmed, J. Ahrens, J. R. M. Annand, H. J. Arends, K. Bantawa, M. Bashkanov, R. Beck, M. Biroth, N. S. Borisov, A. Braghieri, W. J. Briscoe, S. Cherepnya, F. Cividini, C. Collicott, S. Costanza, A. Denig, M. Dieterle, E. J. Downie, P. Drexler, M. I. Ferretti Bondy, L.V. Filʼkov, S. Gardner, S. Garni, D. I. Glazier, I. Gorodnov, W. Gradl, Michael Günther, G. M. Gurevich, C. B. Hamill, L. Heijkenskjöld, D. Hornidge, G. M. Huber, A. Käser, V. L. Kashevarov, S. Kay, I. Keshelashvili, R. Kondratiev, M. Korolija, B. Krusche, A. B. Lazarev, V. Lisin, K. Livingston, S. Lutterer, I. J. D. MacGregor, D. M. Manley, P. P. Martel, J. C. McGeorge, D. G. Middleton, R. Miskimen, E. Mornacchi, A. Mushkarenkov, A. Neganov, A. Neiser, M. Oberle, M. Ostrick, P. B. Otte, D. Paudyal, P. Pedroni, A. Polonski, G. Ron, T. Rostomyan, A. Sarty, C. Sfienti, K. Spieker, O. Steffen, I. I. Strakovsky, B. Strandberg, Th. Strub, I. Supek, A. Thiel, M. Thiel, A. Thomas, M. Unverzagt, Yu. A. Usov, S. R. Wagner, N. K. Walford, D. P. Watts, D. Werthmüller, J. Wettig, L. Witthauer, M. Wolfes, L. Zana

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMount Allison UniversitySaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Regina
FundersInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMount Allison UniversityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchTomsk Polytechnic UniversityCarl-Zeiss-StiftungU.S. Department of EnergyGeorge Washington UniversitySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsObservableEvent (particle physics)AlgorithmEnergy (signal processing)PhysicsComputer scienceStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data available from the A2 Collaboration at MAMI were analyzed to select the $\ensuremath{\gamma}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}\ensuremath{\eta}p$ reaction on an event-by-event basis, which allows for partial-wave analyses of three-body final states to obtain more reliable results, compared to fits to measured distributions. These data provide the world's best statistical accuracy in the energy range from threshold to ${E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}=1.45$ GeV, allowing a finer energy binning in the measurement of all observables needed for understanding the reaction dynamics. The results obtained for the measured observables are compared to existing models, and the impact from the new data is checked by the fit with the revised Mainz model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207