MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792950103 · doi:10.1039/c8nr00276b

Arsenic for high-capacity lithium- and sodium-ion batteries

2018· article· en· W2792950103 on OpenAlexaff
Young Rok Lim, Fazel Shojaei, Kidong Park, Chan Su Jung, Jeunghee Park, Won Il Cho, Hong Seok Kang

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaKorea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and PlanningMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningMinistry of Trade, Industry and EnergyPohang University of Science and TechnologyKorea Basic Science InstituteMinistry of Science ICT and Future PlanningJeonju University
KeywordsLithium (medication)SodiumArsenicIonMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgyMedicineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207