A211 OUTCOME OF CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY IN THE SETTING OF IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA IN PATIENTS ABOVE AGE 65.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common indication for a capsule endoscopy (CE), which is often offered after a negative bidirectional endoscopy. Since malignancy is a concern in the older population with IDA, upper and lower endoscopic exams are typically performed. If these tests are negative, a CE study may be offered to evaluate the small intestine. However, choosing the ideal candidates who will benefit from a CE study is challenging. To assess the outcomes for CE in patients with IDA over age 65 and which factors are more likely to contribute to a positive result. A retrospective review of all CE studies at St. Paul’s Hospital from 01/10-06/16 was conducted after ethics approval. Inclusion: age>65, hemoglobin<120 g/dL, serum ferritin<70 mg/L, minimum 12 month follow up and at least one high quality complete EGD/colonoscopy performed prior to CE. Variables to assess factors that are more likely to contribute to a positive capsule yield included: use of anticoagulation, NSAIDs, and cardiac disease. Chi-Square test was used to determine clinical predictive factors of a positive and negative study. 1149 CE studies were reviewed of which 106 CE studies met inclusion criteria. 43 studies (40.6%) had positive findings and from this group, 26 (60.5%) recommended active intervention (i.e. EGD n=7, colonoscopy n=9, enteroscopy n=5, small bowel resection n=3, escalation of Crohn’s therapy n=2), while 17 (39.5%) were managed supportively, typically with Fe supplementation. Most negative studies (57 of 63) recommended supportive therapy (others: hematological workup n=3, hiatal hernia repair n=1, PPI initiation n=1, stop donating blood n=1). History of cardiac disease had a significant association with positive findings (0.54 vs. 0.33, p=0.039). Conversely, a known history of hiatal hernia was associated with a negative study (0.22 vs. 0.07, p=0.036). These findings suggest that the diagnostic yield of CE in IDA in patients above age 65 is relatively low. The majority of all CE studies recommended supportive therapy and/or repeat endoscopic exams (EGD/Colonoscopy) of areas previously assessed. Clinical history of cardiac disease was associated with more positive findings on CE, whereas the presence of a hiatal hernia was associated with a negative study. Emphasis on these data may help select more appropriate patients for CE. Positive CE Findings by Location (N=43) SB=Small Bowel, ICV= Ileocecal Valve, TI= Terminal Ileum St. Paul’s Hospital GI Research Institute
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".