MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792994937 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.211

A211 OUTCOME OF CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY IN THE SETTING OF IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA IN PATIENTS ABOVE AGE 65.

2018· article· en· W2792994937 on OpenAlexaff
J G Lee, Cherry Galorport, Robert Enns

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapsule endoscopyMedicineEnteroscopyColonoscopyGastroenterologyIron-deficiency anemiaInternal medicineAnemiaPopulationDouble-balloon enteroscopyEndoscopyMalignancySurgeryColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common indication for a capsule endoscopy (CE), which is often offered after a negative bidirectional endoscopy. Since malignancy is a concern in the older population with IDA, upper and lower endoscopic exams are typically performed. If these tests are negative, a CE study may be offered to evaluate the small intestine. However, choosing the ideal candidates who will benefit from a CE study is challenging. To assess the outcomes for CE in patients with IDA over age 65 and which factors are more likely to contribute to a positive result. A retrospective review of all CE studies at St. Paul’s Hospital from 01/10-06/16 was conducted after ethics approval. Inclusion: age>65, hemoglobin<120 g/dL, serum ferritin<70 mg/L, minimum 12 month follow up and at least one high quality complete EGD/colonoscopy performed prior to CE. Variables to assess factors that are more likely to contribute to a positive capsule yield included: use of anticoagulation, NSAIDs, and cardiac disease. Chi-Square test was used to determine clinical predictive factors of a positive and negative study. 1149 CE studies were reviewed of which 106 CE studies met inclusion criteria. 43 studies (40.6%) had positive findings and from this group, 26 (60.5%) recommended active intervention (i.e. EGD n=7, colonoscopy n=9, enteroscopy n=5, small bowel resection n=3, escalation of Crohn’s therapy n=2), while 17 (39.5%) were managed supportively, typically with Fe supplementation. Most negative studies (57 of 63) recommended supportive therapy (others: hematological workup n=3, hiatal hernia repair n=1, PPI initiation n=1, stop donating blood n=1). History of cardiac disease had a significant association with positive findings (0.54 vs. 0.33, p=0.039). Conversely, a known history of hiatal hernia was associated with a negative study (0.22 vs. 0.07, p=0.036). These findings suggest that the diagnostic yield of CE in IDA in patients above age 65 is relatively low. The majority of all CE studies recommended supportive therapy and/or repeat endoscopic exams (EGD/Colonoscopy) of areas previously assessed. Clinical history of cardiac disease was associated with more positive findings on CE, whereas the presence of a hiatal hernia was associated with a negative study. Emphasis on these data may help select more appropriate patients for CE. Positive CE Findings by Location (N=43) SB=Small Bowel, ICV= Ileocecal Valve, TI= Terminal Ileum St. Paul’s Hospital GI Research Institute

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207