MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793004799 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.319

A318 OUTCOMES OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY IN CHILDREN: A 15 YEAR REVIEW

2018· article· en· W2793004799 on OpenAlexaff
Jolène Breton, Julie Lemale, V Marchand

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomyMedicineGastrostomyFailure to thriveMalnutritionPediatricsParenteral nutritionComplicationCystic fibrosisSurgeryFeeding tubePEG ratioInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) has become a key element in managing children with nutrition or feeding issues. Reversal of malnutrition shortly after gastrostomy has been shown in many pediatric studies, however literature on maintenance of nutritional status following initial catch-up growth is limited. To analyze the long-term follow-up of children with PEG in terms of nutritional outcomes as defined by improvement in weight-for-height z scores. To review the procedure-related complication rates specific to our center. This is a retrospective review of all PEG procedures performed at our tertiary Children’s Hospital from 1999 to 2015. All PEGs were placed by the same team of pediatric gastroenterologists using the standard pull technique. Prophylactic antibiotics were given for 24h. Nutritional outcomes were evaluated by comparing the weight-for-height z scores (CDC growth charts) at the time of tube placement and either at the time of last follow-up for children receiving gastrostomy feeding, or at the time of tube removal, fundoplication or death. PEG-related complications were recorded. In the 256 patients who underwent successful PEG placement, diagnoses were as follow: neuromuscular disease (n=136, 53%), cystic fibrosis (n=30, 12%), metabolic disease (n=18, 7%), chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes (n=18, 7%), nonorganic failure to thrive (n=39, 15%) and other (n=15, 6%). Median age at the time of PEG placement was 3.9 years (0.4–19.9 years) and median follow-up duration was 3.2 years (0–16 years). Significant improvement in weight-for-heigth z score was reported for all subgroups except for the “metabolic disease” and “other” subgroups: neuromuscular disease (△=0.62, P=0.0008), cystic fibrosis (△=0.8, P=0.004), metabolic disease (△=0.37, P=0.4), chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes (△=1.01, P=0.01), nonorganic failure to thrive (△=0.7, P=0.005). A total of 61 complications were reported: 35 cellulitis including 17 requiring intravenous antibiotics, 16 accidental dislodgements, 7 buried bumper syndromes, and 2 perforations. A total of 123 patients had known reflux prior to PEG placement, while 39 (32%) had resolution of symptoms, 84 (68%) had persistent reflux with 18 requiring fundoplicature. Our study illustrates that improvement in nutritional status following PEG is maintained during the long term, reinforcing the benefits of gastrostomy feeding when enteral nutrition is required. PEG is a safe method to provide enteral feeding in children. Future studies defining preoperative clinical factors to help clinicians to predict which patient populations are at higher risk of poor nutritional rehabilitation, complications or need for anti-reflux surgery are needed. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207