Efficacy of <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> for control of Mucor rot of apple during commercial storage and potential modes of action
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates 1-112, 2-28, and 4-6, to control Mucor piriformis (Mucor rot) on Gala, McIntosh, Ambrosia, and Spartan apple cultivars in commercial cold storage and their possible mechanisms of action were investigated. Isolates 1-112 and 2-28 provided significant levels of disease control on McIntosh and Spartan apples, while isolate 4-6 provided control of Mucor rot on Gala and Spartan apples, compared with control fruits after 15 weeks of storage at 0 °C. Mycelial growth of M. piriformis was markedly inhibited by cell-free supernatant and volatile organic compounds produced by P. fluorescens isolates, in vitro. In filter-sterilized apple juice, living cells of all 3 P. fluorescens isolates or their metabolites significantly inhibited spore germination by 99.8% and 61.6%, on average, respectively. Electron microscopy indicated that all 3 isolates of P. fluorescens colonized the hyphae of M. piriformis, but only isolate 1-112 was observed to colonize M. piriformis spores in vitro. In the wounds of apple, all 3 isolates formed a biofilm on the fungal hyphae and on the fruit tissue. Potential mechanisms of antagonism utilized by P. fluorescens against M. piriformis may include competition for nutrients and space, production of inhibitory metabolites and volatiles, and biofilm formation, leading to inhibition of spore germination and mycelial growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".