MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Statin use and outcomes of patients (pts) with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) being treated with abiraterone (Abi).

2018· article· en· W2793295628 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacob A. Gordon, Bernhard J. Eigl, Jennifer A. Locke, Gregory R. Pond, Cyrus Chehroudi, Daniel Khalaf, Kim N., Michael Cox

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerHazard ratioStatinProportional hazards modelInternal medicineOncologyProstatectomyCohortAndrogen deprivation therapyCancerDocetaxelConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

277 Background: Epidemiologic studies support an association between statin use and improved prostate cancer specific mortality. Several different biologic mechanisms for such an effect have been proposed, including a potential role in reducing androgen precursor bioavailability. It is hypothesized that statins may therefore improve outcomes specifically in patients treated with the CYP17 inhibitor Abi. Di Lorenzo (2017) recently published an analysis of 187 pts showing a relationship between Abi and improved survival (OS). We report the results of a larger confirmatory analysis in a separate cohort. Methods: Disease outcome and statin use were assessed retrospectively in locally advanced or metastatic CRPC patients receiving Abi in British Columbia, Canada. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival times, Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression were used to investigate factors potentially prognostic of overall survival and PSA response respectively. A multivariable model was constructed using factors with limited missing data and known biologic rationale. Impact of statins was then assessed adjusting for factors included in the multivariable model. Results: 301 patients receiving Abi were assessed, of whom 84 (28%) were statin users. Median OS of Abi patients was 11.3 months for non-statin users and 16.2 months for statin users (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.61-1.03, p = 0.079). Effect of statin use remained borderline after adjusting (n = 279, hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.59-1.04, p = 0.087) for age, prior prostatectomy, radiation, Docetaxel, time from diagnosis, neutrophils-lymphocyte ratio and presence of metastases. Forty-eight percent of statin users and 37% of non-statin users had a PSA response (multivariable odds ratio = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.91-2.78, p = 0.11). Conclusions: Although limited by sample size, our data showed a trend that statins may mildly enhance the anti-tumor effects of Abi in CRPC patients. These results support the findings of Di Lorenzo et al. (2017), and suggest that depletion of de novo cholesterol production may further limit androgen synthesis in concert with CYP17A1 inhibition. Further studies are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207