MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793362318 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2017-0731

Calculation of the tilt angle and susceptibility as functions of temperature and the electric field close to the Sm A – Sm C* transition in C7

2018· article· en· W2793362318 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. Aksoy, H. Yurtseven, M. Kurt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric fieldFerroelectricityPhysicsCondensed matter physicsTilt (camera)Liquid crystalDielectricPhase transitionField (mathematics)InverseCoupling constantPolarization (electrochemistry)OpticsQuantum mechanicsGeometryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smectic A – Smectic C* transition in the ferroelectric liquid crystal (C7) is studied as a function of the electric field and the temperature. By expanding the free energy in terms of the tilt angle θ (Smectic C* phase) and the polarization P with a linear coupling between θ and P (Pθ) in mean field theory, the tilt angle is calculated as a function of the electric field (θ versus E) at constant temperatures with respect to the transition temperature for C7 using the observed data from the literature. Also, by extracting the tilt angle from the observed electric displacements at various temperatures (at constant field strength) the inverse tilt angle susceptibility ([Formula: see text]), derived from the free energy, is fitted to the observed data for the dielectric constant and the fitted parameters are determined. Our calculated θ and χ θ . show that the mean field theory explains adequately the observed behavior of the Smectic A – Smectic C* transition in the liquid crystals C7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207