MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793424233 · doi:10.1117/12.2289092

Serial OCT reveals age-dependent cardiac fiber orientation change (Conference Presentation)

2018· article· en· W2793424233 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Castonguay, Joël Lefebvre, Frédéric Lesage

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocardiumOptical coherence tomographyMyocyteMedicineMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringVentricleApex (geometry)AnatomyCardiologyInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aging is accompanied by complex structural changes in the heart. To explore this remodeling, we used a serial optical coherence tomography scanner to image the entire heart at a microscopic resolution. The imaging platform combines optical coherence microscopy to vibratome sectioning to automatically image every subsection of the sample. Post-processing algorithms were then used to stitch back together the sample in a large 3D dataset. We imaged the heart of 7 young (4 months) and 5 old (24 months) wildtype mice (C57B16) with the imaging platform. Optical coherence tomography of the myocardium reveals myofiber orientation that changes linearly from the endocardium to the epicardium. This change in orientation also varies with the distance from the apex of the heart : close to the apex, the change in myofiber orientation with respect to wall depth is larger. In old mice, this change was lower when compared to young mice due to remodelling. As reported in other works, the average volume of old mice hearts (97 ± 3 mm3) was significantly larger (p<0.05) when compared to young hearts (87 ± 3 mm3). Myocardial wall thickening was accompanied by a reduction of light attenuation in the endocardium. Attenuation coefficient in old mice endocardium was measured at 15.4 ± 0.4 cm-1, compared to 18.6 ± 0.5 cm-1 in young mice, which was significantly lower (p<0.05). The use of a serial optical coherence tomography allows new insight into fine changes of the whole heart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→