MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2793440159 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.221

A220 THE EFFECT OF HOMELESSNESS ON HCV TREATMENT OUTCOMES AMONG PEOPLE WHO INJECT DRUGS

2018· article· en· W2793440159 on OpenAlexaffabout
Akash Singh, G Kiani, R Shahi, Arshia Alimohammadi, Tyler Raycraft, Brian Conway

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsVancouver Infectious Diseases Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatitis CPopulationPsychiatryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent European guidelines have identified people who inject drugs (PWID) as a priority population to receive HCV treatment. Achievement and maintenance of a sustained virologic response (SVR) may be influenced by a number of factors, including the social determinants of health in such vulnerable populations. One such variable may be unstable housing. We sought to evaluate the impact of homelessness on the achievement and maintenance of SVR in both HCV mono-infected and hepatitis C/human immunodeficiency virus (HCV/HIV) co-infected PWID receiving HCV therapy at a tertiary clinic located in downtown Vancouver. The target population consisted of HCV-infected PWID receiving HCV therapy according to contemporary clinical guidelines within the multidisciplinary program at the Vancouver Infectious Diseases Center (VIDC), providing care to address medical, psychological, social and addiction-related needs. Demographic information was collected including patters of recreational drug use. Self-declared homelessness was ascertained by a self-administered questionnaire. The initial endpoint of the study was achievement and maintenance of SVR, with patients followed every 6 months after SVR, more frequently in the setting of suspected HCV re-infection, with such re-infection post-SVR considered a failure of treatment. The study population included 38 individuals of whom 7 (12.5%) women, 20 (53%) HIV co-infected, 24 (63%) genotype 1, 20 (53%), on opiate substitution therapy, with mixed patterns of recreational drug use (39% opiates, 17% cocaine, 47% amphetamines). Homelessness was present in 38 (100%). The crude SVR rate was 79% (30/38), higher in HCV mono-infected individuals (89% vs. 70%). In addition, 2 cases of HCV re-infection were documented, all among HIV co-infected individuals, leading to an effective SVR rate of 60% in this sub-group. Overall, homelessness was associated with a 30% increase in risk of not achieving and maintaining SVR. Type of recreational drug use (opiates vs. stimulants) was not associated with the likelihood of HCV treatment success. High rates of response to HCV treatment can be achieved and maintained among active PWID. However, in this vulnerable population, attention must be paid to non-traditional factors that may influence outcomes, including homelessness, especially among those who are co-infected with HIV. As more PWID are offered HCV therapy, programs must be developed to address short and long-term housing to maximize the impact of these interventions. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicHepatitis C virus research→French-language works237,207→