Mg<sub>65</sub>Ni<sub>20</sub>Y<sub>15–<i>X</i></sub>Ag<sub><i>X</i></sub> (<i>X</i> = 1, 2, 3, 5) alloys prepared via atmosphere controlled induction system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, Mg 65 Ni 20 Y 15–X Ag X (X = 1, 2, 3, 5) alloys were manufactured by atmosphere controlled induction system. The effect of Ag ratio on the microstructural properties, micro-hardness, density, and homogeneity of the Mg–Ni–Y alloys were investigated. These alloys were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) and Vickers micro-hardness measurement. According to XRD results, Ni 3 Y and Mg 6 Ni phases were observed as well as AgY and Ag 17 Mg 54 phases, which were obtained in alloys. The quantitative results of EDX analysis confirm that the chemical composition of the obtained phases is very close and their homogeneities are so high. The average micro-hardness values of the ingot alloys were measured between 208 and 266 HV for matrix. The elastic modulus and densities of the Mg 65 Ni 20 Y 15–X Ag X (X = 1, 2, 3, 5) alloys increased by increasing Ag in the alloys and they were determined in the range of 58.18–68.12 GPa and 3.14–3.53 g/cm 3 , respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".