MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793476072 · doi:10.1515/jos-2018-0003

Design-Based Estimation with Record-Linked Administrative Files and a Clerical Review Sample

2018· review· en· W2793476072 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Official Statistics · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorSample (material)StatisticsRecord linkageEstimationLinkage (software)PopulationEconometricsRegression analysisComputer scienceMissing dataRegressionMathematicsDemographySociologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article looks at the estimation of an association parameter between two variables in a finite population, when the variables are separately recorded in two population registers that are also imperfectly linked. The main problem is the occurrence of linkage errors that include bad links and missing links. A methodology is proposed when clerical-reviews may reliably determine the match status of a record-pair, for example using names, demographic and address information. It features clerical-reviews on a probability sample of pairs and regression estimators that are assisted by a statistical model of comparison outcomes in a pair. Like other regression estimators, this estimator is design-consistent regardless of the model validity. It is also more efficient when the model holds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.500
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.019 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it