Phospho-regulation of ATOH1 Is Required for Plasticity of Secretory Progenitors and Tissue Regeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The intestinal epithelium is maintained by a small number of self-renewing stem cells in homeostasis. In addition committed progenitors can contribute to the functional stem cell compartment at a low level during homeostasis and substantially during regeneration following tissue damage. However the mechanism of, and requirement for, progenitor plasticity in mediating pathological response has not been demonstrated. Here we show that multisite phosphorylation of the transcription factor Atoh1 is required both for the contribution of secretory progenitors to the intestinal stem cell pool and for a robust regenerative response following damage. In lineage tracing experiments Atoh1 + cells ( Atoh1 (WT)CreERT2 mice) show stem cell activity by giving rise to multilineage intestinal clones both in the steady state and after tissue damage. Notably in the colonic epithelium a single generation of Atoh1 + progenitors sustains 1 in 15 stem cells. In an activating Atoh1 (9S/T-A)CreERT2 line, the loss of phosphorylation sites on the Atoh1 protein promotes secretory differentiation and inhibits the contribution of these cells to self-renewal. Finally, in a chemical colitis model the Atoh1 + cells of Atoh1 (9S/T-A)CreERT2 mice have reduced clonogenic capacity that impacts overall regenerative response of the epithelium. Thus progenitor plasticity plays an integral part in maintaining robust self-renewal in the intestinal epithelium and the balance between stem and progenitor fate behaviour is directly co-ordinated by Atoh1 multi-site phosphorylation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".