MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793531504 · doi:10.1002/fsh.10027

PITR: A New Open Source R Package for PIT Telemetry Data

2018· article· en· W2793531504 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joel Harding, D. C. Braun, Nicholas J. Burnett, Annika E. Putt

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsInStream Fisheries Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemetryOpen sourceR packageComputer scienceOperating systemTelecommunicationsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FisheriesVolume 43, Issue 1 p. 5-5 Column: Technology PITR: A New Open Source R Package for PIT Telemetry Data Joel M. S. Harding, Joel M. S. Harding InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorDouglas C. Braun, Douglas C. Braun InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorNicholas J. Burnett, Corresponding Author Nicholas J. Burnett nich@instream.net InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaCorresponding author e-mail: nich@instream.netSearch for more papers by this authorAnnika Putt, Annika Putt InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this author Joel M. S. Harding, Joel M. S. Harding InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorDouglas C. Braun, Douglas C. Braun InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorNicholas J. Burnett, Corresponding Author Nicholas J. Burnett nich@instream.net InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaCorresponding author e-mail: nich@instream.netSearch for more papers by this authorAnnika Putt, Annika Putt InStream Fisheries Research Inc., 2323 Boundary Road, Unit 215, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4V4 CanadaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 February 2018 https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10027Citations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume43, Issue1January 2018Pages 5-5 RelatedInformation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1570.176

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFisheriesSame topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207