Una mirada "comparada" sobre algunas experiencias de códigos éticos y de conducta en la función pública
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl presente articulo realiza una descripcion de los principales modelos de codigos de conducta en el sector publico existentes en la actualidad haciendo hincapie en sus presupuestos conceptuales y en los valores que ensalzan. Tras una introduccion sobre el papel de la etica en la funcion publica a lo largo de la historia, se describen los modelos del reino unido, Francia y Canada. A continuacion se detalla el papel de las Leyes de Funcion Publica y el EbEP en la definicion de los deberes y principios de actuacion de los empleados publicos en Espana. Finalmente se describen instrumentos de autorregulacion como los de la Comunidad Autonoma de Galicia, la Comision Nacional de los mercados y de la Competencia, el Consejo General del Poder Judicial o el Ayuntamiento de barcelona. El articulo se cierra con un breve analisis del Codigo etico y de buena Gestion del Empleo Publico de la diputacion Foral de Gipuzkoa, aprobado recientemente (noviembre de 2017). una experiencia pionera en Espana. EnglishThis article presents a description of the main models of codes of conduct in the public sector in the current context, emphasizing their conceptual foundations and the values they extol. After an introduction on the role of ethics in the civil service throughout history, the models of the united Kingdom, France and Canada are described. Next, the role of the Civil Service Laws and the EbEP in the definition of the duties and principles of action of public employees in Spain is detailed. Finally, self-regulatory instruments are described, such as those of the Autonomous Community of Galicia, the National Commission of markets and Competition, the General Council of the Judiciary or the City of barcelona. The article closes with a brief analysis of the Code of Ethics and Good management of Public Employment of the Provincial Council of Gipuzkoa, recently approved (November 2017). A pioneering experience in Spain. euskaraArtikulu honetan gaur egun indarrean dauden sektore publikoko jokabide-kodeen ereduei buruzko deskribapen bat aurkezten da, euren oinarri kontzeptualak eta balioespenak azpimarratuz. Etikak funtzio publikoan historian zehar izan duen paperari buruzko aurkezpena egin ondoren, Erresuma batua, Frantzia eta Kanadako ereduak deskribatzen dira. ondoren, Funtzio Publikoko Legeen eta EbEPen zeregina zehazten da Espainiako langile publikoen betebeharren eta jokabide-printzipioen definizioan. Azkenik, autorregulazioko tresnak deskribatzen dira, hala nola, Galiziako Autonomia Erkidegoarena, merkatuen eta Lehiaren batzorde Nazionalarena, botere Judizialaren Kontseilu Nagusiarena edo bartzelonako udalarena. Artikulu honen amaieran Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundiko Enplegu Publikoaren Etikaren eta Kudeaketa onaren kodea aztertzen da, berriki onartua (2017ko azaroa). Esperientzia aitzindaria Espainian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".